Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of Cylofold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of NanoFolder
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & NanoFolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
Cylofold |
|
NanoFolder |
| MCC |
0.620 |
>
|
0.546 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.710
±
0.130
|
>
|
0.683
±
0.160
|
| Sensitivity |
0.526 |
<
|
0.539 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.740 |
>
|
0.565 |
| Total TP |
162 |
<
|
166 |
| Total TN |
25514 |
>
|
25439 |
| Total FP |
58 |
<
|
132 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
5 |
<
|
16 |
| Total FP INCONS |
52 |
<
|
112 |
| Total FP COMP |
1 |
<
|
4 |
| Total FN |
146 |
>
|
142 |
| P-value |
2.41358941668e-08 |
Performance of Cylofold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
162 |
| Total TN |
25514 |
| Total FP |
58 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
5 |
| Total FP INCONS |
52 |
| Total FP COMP |
1 |
| Total FN |
146 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.620 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.710
±
0.130
|
| Sensitivity |
0.526 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.740 |
| Nr of predictions |
14 |
Performance of NanoFolder
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for NanoFolder
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
166 |
| Total TN |
25439 |
| Total FP |
132 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
16 |
| Total FP INCONS |
112 |
| Total FP COMP |
4 |
| Total FN |
142 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.546 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.683
±
0.160
|
| Sensitivity |
0.539 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.565 |
| Nr of predictions |
14 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|