CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & RSpredict(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Cylofold RSpredict(20)
MCC 0.608 > 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.145 > 0.547 ± 0.137
Sensitivity 0.523 > 0.456
Positive Predictive Value 0.712 < 0.757
Total TP 257 > 224
Total TN 68738 < 68803
Total FP 128 > 75
Total FP CONTRA 19 > 17
Total FP INCONS 85 > 55
Total FP COMP 24 > 3
Total FN 234 < 267
P-value 2.18141491686e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Cylofold and RSpredict(20). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RSpredict(20)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Cylofold and RSpredict(20). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Cylofold and RSpredict(20)).

^top





Performance of Cylofold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 257
Total TN 68738
Total FP 128
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 85
Total FP COMP 24
Total FN 234
Total Scores
MCC 0.608
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.145
Sensitivity 0.523
Positive Predictive Value 0.712
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2XKV_B 0.38 0.40 0.36 8 4538 23 7 7 9 12
2XQD_Y 0.81 0.78 0.84 21 2825 4 4 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.10 0.10 0.11 4 5115 32 1 31 0 38
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3O58_2 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 7232 3 0 2 1 12
3O58_3 0.36 0.34 0.38 12 12371 29 5 15 9 23
3PDR_A 0.72 0.54 0.95 39 12839 4 0 2 2 33
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of RSpredict(20) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 224
Total TN 68803
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 55
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 267
Total Scores
MCC 0.585
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.547 ± 0.137
Sensitivity 0.456
Positive Predictive Value 0.757
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.55 0.50 0.63 10 974 6 0 6 0 10
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4556 4 0 4 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.46 0.21 1.00 9 5142 0 0 0 0 33
3AMU_B 0.61 0.41 0.92 11 2991 1 0 1 0 16
3IZF_C 0.75 0.61 0.92 33 6867 3 1 2 0 21
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3O58_3 0.32 0.34 0.30 12 12363 28 12 16 0 23
3PDR_A 0.67 0.49 0.92 35 12842 5 0 3 2 37
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.68 0.60 0.78 25 3884 7 1 6 0 17
4AOB_A 0.28 0.14 0.55 6 4360 5 0 5 0 36
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 1317 3 0 3 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.