Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of Cylofold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of TurboFold(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for Cylofold & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
Cylofold |
|
TurboFold(20) |
| MCC |
0.689 |
>
|
0.679 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.732
±
0.193
|
>
|
0.696
±
0.112
|
| Sensitivity |
0.576 |
>
|
0.537 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.830 |
<
|
0.865 |
| Total TP |
117 |
>
|
109 |
| Total TN |
16951 |
<
|
16966 |
| Total FP |
27 |
>
|
20 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
<
|
3 |
| Total FP INCONS |
22 |
>
|
14 |
| Total FP COMP |
3 |
=
|
3 |
| Total FN |
86 |
<
|
94 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance of Cylofold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
117 |
| Total TN |
16951 |
| Total FP |
27 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
2 |
| Total FP INCONS |
22 |
| Total FP COMP |
3 |
| Total FN |
86 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.689 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.732
±
0.193
|
| Sensitivity |
0.576 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.830 |
| Nr of predictions |
7 |
Performance of TurboFold(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
109 |
| Total TN |
16966 |
| Total FP |
20 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
3 |
| Total FP INCONS |
14 |
| Total FP COMP |
3 |
| Total FN |
94 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.679 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.696
±
0.112
|
| Sensitivity |
0.537 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.865 |
| Nr of predictions |
7 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|