Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of Fold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of Cylofold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for Fold & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
Fold |
|
Cylofold |
| MCC |
0.701 |
>
|
0.648 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.698
±
0.076
|
>
|
0.676
±
0.066
|
| Sensitivity |
0.629 |
>
|
0.559 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.786 |
>
|
0.758 |
| Total TP |
931 |
>
|
827 |
| Total TN |
155122 |
<
|
155215 |
| Total FP |
306 |
>
|
305 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
30 |
<
|
36 |
| Total FP INCONS |
223 |
<
|
228 |
| Total FP COMP |
53 |
>
|
41 |
| Total FN |
549 |
<
|
653 |
| P-value |
3.56938820447e-08 |
Performance of Fold
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Fold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
931 |
| Total TN |
155122 |
| Total FP |
306 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
30 |
| Total FP INCONS |
223 |
| Total FP COMP |
53 |
| Total FN |
549 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.701 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.698
±
0.076
|
| Sensitivity |
0.629 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.786 |
| Nr of predictions |
63 |
Performance of Cylofold
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
827 |
| Total TN |
155215 |
| Total FP |
305 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
36 |
| Total FP INCONS |
228 |
| Total FP COMP |
41 |
| Total FN |
653 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.648 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.676
±
0.066
|
| Sensitivity |
0.559 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.758 |
| Nr of predictions |
63 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|