CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for IPknot & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric IPknot Contrafold
MCC 0.675 > 0.658
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.711 ± 0.092 > 0.708 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.573 < 0.576
Positive Predictive Value 0.801 > 0.759
Total TP 443 < 445
Total TN 77424 > 77391
Total FP 129 < 168
Total FP CONTRA 17 < 23
Total FP INCONS 93 < 118
Total FP COMP 19 < 27
Total FN 330 > 328
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


^top





Performance of IPknot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 443
Total TN 77424
Total FP 129
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 93
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 330
Total Scores
MCC 0.675
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.711 ± 0.092
Sensitivity 0.573
Positive Predictive Value 0.801
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.40 0.30 0.55 6 1529 5 1 4 0 14
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.77 0.91 30 6072 4 0 3 1 9
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
2YIE_X - 0.67 0.58 0.78 7 1369 3 1 1 1 5
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 2 0 1 1 7
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.19 0.25 3 1116 9 1 8 0 13
3J0L_h - 0.78 0.60 1.00 26 6079 2 0 0 2 17
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.61 0.48 0.80 20 3891 5 0 5 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.68 0.54 0.87 20 3137 3 1 2 0 17
3UZL_B 0.72 0.54 0.95 20 3549 1 0 1 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A1C_2 0.17 0.15 0.19 5 11755 26 4 17 5 28
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 1 5 0 23
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.52 0.42 0.67 8 1314 4 0 4 0 11

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 445
Total TN 77391
Total FP 168
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 118
Total FP COMP 27
Total FN 328
Total Scores
MCC 0.658
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.708 ± 0.091
Sensitivity 0.576
Positive Predictive Value 0.759
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 2 3 0 13
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.84 0.79 0.89 31 6070 6 0 4 2 8
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
2YIE_X - 0.73 0.67 0.80 8 1368 3 1 1 1 4
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1213 2 0 1 1 8
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.50 0.44 0.58 7 1116 5 2 3 0 9
3J0L_h - 0.75 0.65 0.88 28 6073 6 0 4 2 15
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1218 7 0 7 0 17
3J0L_g - 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 464 1 1 0 0 4
3J0L_2 - 0.25 0.24 0.28 8 6187 26 0 21 5 25
3J16_L 0.46 0.40 0.55 12 2753 10 1 9 0 18
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 2 7 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.74 0.64 0.88 7 370 1 0 1 0 4
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.59 0.46 0.77 17 3138 5 0 5 0 20
3UZL_B 0.70 0.54 0.91 20 3548 2 0 2 0 17
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 33 5 20 8 28
4A1C_3 0.66 0.57 0.78 31 7100 9 1 8 0 23
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.44 0.36 0.56 15 4344 13 1 11 1 27
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1314 1 1 0 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.