CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MCFold & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MCFold RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.502 > 0.358
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.095 > 0.310 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.526 > 0.195
Positive Predictive Value 0.487 < 0.669
Total TP 594 > 220
Total TN 146046 < 146936
Total FP 694 > 115
Total FP CONTRA 85 > 7
Total FP INCONS 540 > 102
Total FP COMP 69 > 6
Total FN 536 < 910
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MCFold and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MCFold and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MCFold and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of MCFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 594
Total TN 146046
Total FP 694
Total FP CONTRA 85
Total FP INCONS 540
Total FP COMP 69
Total FN 536
Total Scores
MCC 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.526
Positive Predictive Value 0.487
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 1 0 0 1 1
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1109 2 0 0 2 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1107 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1108 1 0 0 1 1
2KUV_A 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1107 0 0 0 0 1
2KUW_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1107 1 0 1 0 1
2KX8_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 844 2 0 1 1 2
2L1F_A 0.72 0.75 0.69 18 2054 9 0 8 1 6
2L1F_B 0.73 0.76 0.70 19 2118 9 0 8 1 6
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2WRQ_Y 0.27 0.35 0.22 6 2823 25 8 13 4 11
2WWQ_V 0.15 0.18 0.15 5 2892 30 4 25 1 23
2XKV_B 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4530 37 2 23 12 15
2XQD_Y 0.34 0.37 0.32 10 2819 22 1 20 1 17
2XXA_G 0.23 0.24 0.24 10 5110 32 1 30 1 32
2ZZN_D 0.61 0.63 0.61 17 2457 13 1 10 2 10
3A2K_C 0.44 0.46 0.42 13 2895 18 2 16 0 15
3A3A_A 0.89 0.86 0.91 32 3620 3 1 2 0 5
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.43 0.39 12 2670 19 3 16 0 16
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3GX2_A 0.47 0.48 0.48 19 4331 22 0 21 1 21
3IVN_B 0.39 0.39 0.40 12 2316 18 0 18 0 19
3IZF_C 0.71 0.69 0.74 37 6853 14 0 13 1 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3JYV_7 0.21 0.22 0.21 7 2817 26 0 26 0 25
3JYX_3 0.41 0.52 0.33 14 6285 34 12 17 5 13
3JYX_4 0.20 0.24 0.17 8 12199 43 16 23 4 25
3LA5_A 0.32 0.32 0.34 11 2453 21 1 20 0 23
3O58_2 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7208 44 5 38 1 29
3O58_3 0.22 0.26 0.19 9 12355 45 9 30 6 26
3PDR_A 0.66 0.61 0.72 44 12819 19 0 17 2 28
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 220
Total TN 146936
Total FP 115
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 102
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 910
Total Scores
MCC 0.358
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.310 ± 0.112
Sensitivity 0.195
Positive Predictive Value 0.669
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 3
2KE6_A 0.83 0.74 0.93 14 1113 2 0 1 1 5
2KUR_A 0.82 0.71 0.94 15 1112 1 0 1 0 6
2KUU_A 0.79 0.67 0.93 14 1113 2 0 1 1 7
2KUV_A 0.80 0.68 0.94 15 1112 1 0 1 0 7
2KUW_A 0.73 0.62 0.87 13 1113 2 0 2 0 8
2KX8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 860 1 0 1 0 18
2L1F_A 0.80 0.75 0.86 18 2059 3 0 3 0 6
2L1F_B 0.85 0.80 0.91 20 2123 2 0 2 0 5
2L94_A 0.57 0.50 0.67 10 975 5 0 5 0 10
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2WRQ_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2848 3 1 1 1 17
2WWQ_V 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2920 6 1 5 0 28
2XKV_B 0.28 0.20 0.40 4 4550 8 2 4 2 16
2XQD_Y 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2845 5 0 5 0 27
2XXA_G 0.34 0.17 0.70 7 5141 3 0 3 0 35
2ZZN_D 0.43 0.19 1.00 5 2480 0 0 0 0 22
3A2K_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2924 2 0 2 0 28
3A3A_A 0.48 0.30 0.79 11 3641 3 0 3 0 26
3AKZ_H 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2699 2 0 2 0 28
3AMU_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3001 2 0 2 0 27
3GX2_A 0.36 0.15 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 34
3IVN_B 0.69 0.52 0.94 16 2329 1 0 1 0 15
3IZF_C 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6898 5 0 5 0 54
3J16_L 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2774 1 0 1 0 30
3JYV_7 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 2846 4 0 4 0 32
3JYX_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 6323 5 1 4 0 27
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12241 5 0 5 0 33
3LA5_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2468 0 0 0 0 17
3O58_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7257 3 0 3 0 38
3O58_3 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12398 2 0 2 0 32
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12872 8 0 8 0 72
3RKF_A 0.71 0.53 0.95 18 2192 1 0 1 0 16
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4A1C_3 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7136 4 1 3 0 54
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16
4ENC_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1321 2 0 2 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.