CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.692 > 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.075 > 0.541 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.585 > 0.526
Positive Predictive Value 0.824 > 0.487
Total TP 661 > 594
Total TN 146463 > 146046
Total FP 214 < 694
Total FP CONTRA 23 < 85
Total FP INCONS 118 < 540
Total FP COMP 73 > 69
Total FN 469 < 536
P-value 5.19332990918e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 661
Total TN 146463
Total FP 214
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 118
Total FP COMP 73
Total FN 469
Total Scores
MCC 0.692
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.075
Sensitivity 0.585
Positive Predictive Value 0.824
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.89 0.84 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 3
2KUR_A 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 1110 1 0 1 0 4
2KUU_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 2 0 1 1 5
2KUV_A 0.85 0.77 0.94 17 1110 1 0 1 0 5
2KUW_A 0.76 0.67 0.88 14 1112 2 0 2 0 7
2KX8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 859 2 0 2 0 18
2L1F_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 2058 1 0 1 0 3
2L1F_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
2L94_A 0.57 0.55 0.61 11 972 7 0 7 0 9
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 11 5 3 3 7
2WWQ_V 0.56 0.46 0.68 13 2907 7 0 6 1 15
2XKV_B 0.59 0.55 0.65 11 4543 18 0 6 12 9
2XQD_Y 0.77 0.67 0.90 18 2830 2 0 2 0 9
2XXA_G 0.67 0.57 0.80 24 5121 7 0 6 1 18
2ZZN_D 0.86 0.74 1.00 20 2465 0 0 0 0 7
3A2K_C 0.84 0.71 1.00 20 2906 0 0 0 0 8
3A3A_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 3629 3 0 2 1 13
3AKZ_H 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2680 0 0 0 0 7
3AMU_B 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2984 1 0 0 1 8
3GX2_A 0.70 0.60 0.83 24 4342 6 0 5 1 16
3IVN_B 0.65 0.45 0.93 14 2331 1 1 0 0 17
3IZF_C 0.67 0.57 0.79 31 6864 9 1 7 1 23
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3JYV_7 0.79 0.63 1.00 20 2830 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_3 0.58 0.56 0.60 15 6303 21 1 9 11 12
3JYX_4 0.38 0.30 0.48 10 12225 21 3 8 10 23
3LA5_A 0.75 0.56 1.00 19 2466 0 0 0 0 15
3O58_2 0.79 0.79 0.79 30 7222 10 4 4 2 8
3O58_3 0.45 0.34 0.60 12 12383 19 2 6 11 23
3PDR_A 0.73 0.63 0.87 45 12828 9 2 5 2 27
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 1 7 0 19
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 594
Total TN 146046
Total FP 694
Total FP CONTRA 85
Total FP INCONS 540
Total FP COMP 69
Total FN 536
Total Scores
MCC 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.526
Positive Predictive Value 0.487
Nr of predictions 38

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 1 0 0 1 1
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1109 2 0 0 2 0
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1107 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1108 1 0 0 1 1
2KUV_A 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1107 0 0 0 0 1
2KUW_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1107 1 0 1 0 1
2KX8_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 844 2 0 1 1 2
2L1F_A 0.72 0.75 0.69 18 2054 9 0 8 1 6
2L1F_B 0.73 0.76 0.70 19 2118 9 0 8 1 6
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2WRQ_Y 0.27 0.35 0.22 6 2823 25 8 13 4 11
2WWQ_V 0.15 0.18 0.15 5 2892 30 4 25 1 23
2XKV_B 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4530 37 2 23 12 15
2XQD_Y 0.34 0.37 0.32 10 2819 22 1 20 1 17
2XXA_G 0.23 0.24 0.24 10 5110 32 1 30 1 32
2ZZN_D 0.61 0.63 0.61 17 2457 13 1 10 2 10
3A2K_C 0.44 0.46 0.42 13 2895 18 2 16 0 15
3A3A_A 0.89 0.86 0.91 32 3620 3 1 2 0 5
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.43 0.39 12 2670 19 3 16 0 16
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3GX2_A 0.47 0.48 0.48 19 4331 22 0 21 1 21
3IVN_B 0.39 0.39 0.40 12 2316 18 0 18 0 19
3IZF_C 0.71 0.69 0.74 37 6853 14 0 13 1 17
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3JYV_7 0.21 0.22 0.21 7 2817 26 0 26 0 25
3JYX_3 0.41 0.52 0.33 14 6285 34 12 17 5 13
3JYX_4 0.20 0.24 0.17 8 12199 43 16 23 4 25
3LA5_A 0.32 0.32 0.34 11 2453 21 1 20 0 23
3O58_2 0.20 0.24 0.17 9 7208 44 5 38 1 29
3O58_3 0.22 0.26 0.19 9 12355 45 9 30 6 26
3PDR_A 0.66 0.61 0.72 44 12819 19 0 17 2 28
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.