CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for MXScarna(seed) & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric MXScarna(seed) RNAwolf
MCC 0.624 > 0.414
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.575 ± 0.167 > 0.434 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.493 > 0.375
Positive Predictive Value 0.796 > 0.467
Total TP 176 > 134
Total TN 42687 > 42621
Total FP 61 < 167
Total FP CONTRA 5 < 16
Total FP INCONS 40 < 137
Total FP COMP 16 > 14
Total FN 181 < 223
P-value 1.45096400029e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for MXScarna(seed) and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 176
Total TN 42687
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 16
Total FN 181
Total Scores
MCC 0.624
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.575 ± 0.167
Sensitivity 0.493
Positive Predictive Value 0.796
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1530 12 0 10 2 20
3AMU_B 0.84 0.70 1.00 19 2984 1 0 0 1 8
3J16_L 0.82 0.67 1.00 20 2755 0 0 0 0 10
3RKF_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 18 2193 0 0 0 0 16
3SD1_A 0.63 0.55 0.74 23 3885 8 1 7 0 19
3UZL_B 0.66 0.49 0.90 18 3550 2 1 1 0 19
4A1C_3 0.75 0.65 0.88 35 7100 5 1 4 0 19
4A1C_2 0.35 0.24 0.50 8 11765 20 1 7 12 25
4AOB_A 0.66 0.55 0.79 23 4342 7 0 6 1 19
4ENB_A 0.48 0.32 0.75 6 1267 2 0 2 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 1 3 0 13

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 134
Total TN 42621
Total FP 167
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 137
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 223
Total Scores
MCC 0.414
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.434 ± 0.143
Sensitivity 0.375
Positive Predictive Value 0.467
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 10 1522 8 0 8 0 10
3AMU_B 0.68 0.63 0.74 17 2980 9 0 6 3 10
3J16_L 0.45 0.40 0.52 12 2752 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.72 0.62 0.84 21 2186 4 0 4 0 13
3SD1_A 0.46 0.43 0.50 18 3880 18 0 18 0 24
3UZL_B 0.72 0.59 0.88 22 3545 4 1 2 1 15
4A1C_3 0.23 0.20 0.28 11 7101 28 2 26 0 43
4A1C_2 0.08 0.09 0.08 3 11741 46 10 27 9 30
4AOB_A 0.23 0.19 0.30 8 4344 20 1 18 1 34
4ENB_A 0.35 0.32 0.40 6 1260 9 1 8 0 13
4ENC_A 0.34 0.32 0.38 6 1310 10 1 9 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.