CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for McQFold & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric McQFold Cylofold
MCC 0.693 > 0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.708 ± 0.066 > 0.671 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.602 > 0.555
Positive Predictive Value 0.803 > 0.755
Total TP 881 > 813
Total TN 154713 < 154733
Total FP 259 < 305
Total FP CONTRA 29 < 36
Total FP INCONS 187 < 228
Total FP COMP 43 > 41
Total FN 583 < 651
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


^top





Performance of McQFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for McQFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 881
Total TN 154713
Total FP 259
Total FP CONTRA 29
Total FP INCONS 187
Total FP COMP 43
Total FN 583
Total Scores
MCC 0.693
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.708 ± 0.066
Sensitivity 0.602
Positive Predictive Value 0.803
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for McQFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.59 0.53 0.68 21 5120 13 3 7 3 19
2KX8_A 0.88 0.83 0.94 15 845 1 0 1 0 3
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.86 0.74 1.00 14 1471 1 0 0 1 5
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.97 0.95 1.00 18 843 0 0 0 0 1
2L3C_B - 0.94 0.88 1.00 15 546 0 0 0 0 2
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 582 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 27 2458 0 0 0 0 7
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 345 0 0 0 0 5
2LDT_A - 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 458 0 0 0 0 8
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.51 0.46 0.58 18 6074 13 2 11 0 21
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 2 0 1 1 3
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2XKV_B 0.31 0.30 0.33 6 4542 25 1 11 13 14
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.27 0.24 0.32 10 5120 21 0 21 0 32
2Y9C_V - 0.59 0.54 0.65 13 2258 8 1 6 1 11
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 6 2 4 0 8
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
3ADB_C - 0.92 0.84 1.00 32 4154 1 0 0 1 6
3AKZ_H 0.68 0.61 0.77 17 2679 6 1 4 1 11
3AM1_B - 0.91 0.83 1.00 29 3211 1 0 0 1 6
3AMU_B 0.75 0.59 0.94 16 2986 3 0 1 2 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.26 0.19 0.38 3 1120 5 1 4 0 13
3J0L_h - 0.65 0.49 0.88 21 6081 3 0 3 0 22
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1215 10 0 10 0 17
3J0L_2 - 0.26 0.24 0.30 8 6189 21 0 19 2 25
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 3 0 1 2 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.81 0.70 0.93 43 9134 4 1 2 1 18
3NKB_B - 0.36 0.31 0.44 8 1998 10 1 9 0 18
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3O58_2 0.83 0.71 0.96 27 7232 2 0 1 1 11
3O58_3 0.26 0.26 0.26 9 12368 26 10 16 0 26
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 0 0 0 0 1
3PDR_A 0.69 0.56 0.87 40 12834 9 0 6 3 32
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 1 0 0 1 2
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.71 0.60 0.86 25 3887 4 0 4 0 17
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.73 0.57 0.95 21 3138 1 0 1 0 16
3UZL_B 0.45 0.41 0.52 15 3541 14 0 14 0 22
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.42 0.33 0.54 14 4345 13 1 11 1 28
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 813
Total TN 154733
Total FP 305
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 228
Total FP COMP 41
Total FN 651
Total Scores
MCC 0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.555
Positive Predictive Value 0.755
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.72 0.60 0.86 24 5123 8 2 2 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.72 0.53 1.00 10 1475 0 0 0 0 9
2L1F_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 2060 0 0 0 0 4
2L1F_B 0.92 0.84 1.00 21 2124 0 0 0 0 4
2L2K_A - 0.82 0.68 1.00 13 848 0 0 0 0 6
2L3C_B - 0.76 0.59 1.00 10 551 0 0 0 0 7
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 27 2458 0 0 0 0 7
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 345 0 0 0 0 5
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.50 0.44 0.59 17 6076 12 2 10 0 22
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2XKV_B 0.38 0.40 0.36 8 4538 23 7 7 9 12
2XQD_Y 0.81 0.78 0.84 21 2825 4 4 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.10 0.10 0.11 4 5115 32 1 31 0 38
2Y9C_V - 0.59 0.54 0.65 13 2258 8 1 6 1 11
2YIE_X - 0.30 0.33 0.29 4 1364 10 2 8 0 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 3 8 0 12
3ADB_C - 0.78 0.71 0.87 27 4155 4 0 4 0 11
3AKZ_H 0.66 0.57 0.76 16 2680 6 0 5 1 12
3AM1_B - 0.76 0.63 0.92 22 3216 2 0 2 0 13
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_a - 0.22 0.19 0.27 3 1117 8 1 7 0 13
3J0L_h - 0.48 0.37 0.62 16 6079 10 0 10 0 27
3J0L_7 - 0.30 0.29 0.33 5 1210 10 0 10 0 12
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.58 0.48 0.71 29 9139 13 1 11 1 32
3NKB_B - 0.40 0.31 0.53 8 2001 7 0 7 0 18
3NMU_E - 0.20 0.17 0.25 1 557 6 1 2 3 5
3O58_2 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 7232 3 0 2 1 12
3O58_3 0.36 0.34 0.38 12 12371 29 5 15 9 23
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 0 0 0 0 1
3PDR_A 0.72 0.54 0.95 39 12839 4 0 2 2 33
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 401 0 0 0 0 7
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.45 0.38 0.54 14 3544 12 1 11 0 23
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.