CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Multilign(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Multilign(20) MCFold
MCC 0.526 > 0.461
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.530 ± 0.240 > 0.487 ± 0.210
Sensitivity 0.434 < 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.643 > 0.458
Total TP 126 < 137
Total TN 36597 > 36494
Total FP 76 < 181
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 19
Total FP INCONS 63 < 143
Total FP COMP 6 < 19
Total FN 164 > 153
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Multilign(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Multilign(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Multilign(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Multilign(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Multilign(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 126
Total TN 36597
Total FP 76
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 63
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 164
Total Scores
MCC 0.526
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.530 ± 0.240
Sensitivity 0.434
Positive Predictive Value 0.643
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Multilign(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2XXA_G 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 5139 12 1 11 0 42
3AMU_B 0.63 0.56 0.71 15 2982 8 0 6 2 12
3RKF_A 0.77 0.62 0.95 21 2189 1 0 1 0 13
3SD1_A 0.57 0.48 0.69 20 3887 9 1 8 0 22
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11747 33 3 26 4 28
4A1C_3 0.70 0.59 0.84 32 7102 6 0 6 0 22
4ENB_A 0.34 0.26 0.45 5 1264 6 1 5 0 14
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 137
Total TN 36494
Total FP 181
Total FP CONTRA 19
Total FP INCONS 143
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 153
Total Scores
MCC 0.461
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.487 ± 0.210
Sensitivity 0.472
Positive Predictive Value 0.458
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2XXA_G 0.23 0.24 0.24 10 5110 32 1 30 1 32
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.