CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Murlet(seed) & RSpredict(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Murlet(seed) RSpredict(seed)
MCC 0.539 > 0.459
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.545 ± 0.074 > 0.452 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.337 > 0.282
Positive Predictive Value 0.868 > 0.754
Total TP 264 > 221
Total TN 104495 < 104506
Total FP 46 < 77
Total FP CONTRA 5 > 3
Total FP INCONS 35 < 69
Total FP COMP 6 > 5
Total FN 519 < 562
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Murlet(seed) and RSpredict(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Murlet(seed) and RSpredict(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Murlet(seed) and RSpredict(seed)).

^top





Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 264
Total TN 104495
Total FP 46
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 519
Total Scores
MCC 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.545 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.337
Positive Predictive Value 0.868
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2KE6_A 0.66 0.53 0.83 10 1116 2 0 2 0 9
2KUR_A 0.63 0.48 0.83 10 1116 2 0 2 0 11
2KUU_A 0.63 0.48 0.83 10 1116 2 0 2 0 11
2KUV_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
2KUW_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 1 0 1 0 5
2L1F_B 0.80 0.72 0.90 18 2125 2 0 2 0 7
2L1F_A 0.82 0.75 0.90 18 2060 2 0 2 0 6
2L94_A 0.59 0.40 0.89 8 981 1 0 1 0 12
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
2XKV_B 0.45 0.20 1.00 4 4556 2 0 0 2 16
2XXA_G 0.38 0.14 1.00 6 5145 0 0 0 0 36
3A3A_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 12 3643 0 0 0 0 25
3GX2_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 26
3IVN_B 0.53 0.39 0.75 12 2330 4 2 2 0 19
3JYX_4 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12241 4 0 2 2 30
3LA5_A 0.58 0.41 0.82 14 2468 3 1 2 0 20
3NPB_A 0.49 0.28 0.87 13 7006 2 1 1 0 33
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3PDR_A 0.44 0.19 1.00 14 12866 0 0 0 0 58
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13

^top



Performance of RSpredict(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RSpredict(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 221
Total TN 104506
Total FP 77
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 69
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 562
Total Scores
MCC 0.459
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.452 ± 0.131
Sensitivity 0.282
Positive Predictive Value 0.754
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for RSpredict(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 3
2KE6_A 0.83 0.74 0.93 14 1113 2 0 1 1 5
2KUR_A 0.82 0.71 0.94 15 1112 1 0 1 0 6
2KUU_A 0.79 0.67 0.93 14 1113 2 0 1 1 7
2KUV_A 0.80 0.68 0.94 15 1112 1 0 1 0 7
2KUW_A 0.73 0.62 0.87 13 1113 2 0 2 0 8
2L1F_B 0.85 0.80 0.91 20 2123 2 0 2 0 5
2L1F_A 0.80 0.75 0.86 18 2059 3 0 3 0 6
2L94_A 0.57 0.50 0.67 10 975 5 0 5 0 10
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1527 13 0 13 0 20
2XKV_B 0.28 0.20 0.40 4 4550 8 2 4 2 16
2XXA_G 0.34 0.17 0.70 7 5141 3 0 3 0 35
3A3A_A 0.48 0.30 0.79 11 3641 3 0 3 0 26
3GX2_A 0.36 0.15 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 34
3IVN_B 0.69 0.52 0.94 16 2329 1 0 1 0 15
3JYX_4 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12241 5 0 5 0 33
3LA5_A 0.70 0.50 1.00 17 2468 0 0 0 0 17
3NPB_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 7017 4 0 4 0 46
3O58_3 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12398 2 0 2 0 32
3PDR_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 12872 8 0 8 0 72
3RKF_A 0.71 0.53 0.95 18 2192 1 0 1 0 16
3SD1_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 3916 0 0 0 0 42
4A1C_2 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 11777 5 1 3 1 33
4AOB_A 0.35 0.14 0.86 6 4364 1 0 1 0 36
4ENB_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1270 2 0 2 0 16
4ENC_A 0.30 0.16 0.60 3 1321 2 0 2 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.