CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot Afold
MCC 0.652 > 0.647
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.722 ± 0.087 > 0.718 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.612 > 0.605
Positive Predictive Value 0.699 > 0.695
Total TP 797 > 788
Total TN 246221 < 246228
Total FP 392 < 398
Total FP CONTRA 62 > 58
Total FP INCONS 282 < 288
Total FP COMP 48 < 52
Total FN 505 < 514
P-value 0.000186465496926

^top




Performance plots


^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 797
Total TN 246221
Total FP 392
Total FP CONTRA 62
Total FP INCONS 282
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 505
Total Scores
MCC 0.652
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.722 ± 0.087
Sensitivity 0.612
Positive Predictive Value 0.699
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.70 0.88 7 343 1 0 1 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.74 0.93 14 1470 1 0 1 0 5
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.85 0.77 0.94 30 6073 4 0 2 2 9
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
2XXA_G 0.26 0.24 0.29 10 5116 25 1 24 0 32
2YIE_X - 0.34 0.33 0.36 4 1367 7 2 5 0 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
3AKZ_H 0.73 0.75 0.72 21 2672 8 4 4 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.74 0.71 0.78 25 3208 7 1 6 0 10
3IYQ_A 0.28 0.31 0.26 29 60616 85 22 59 4 65
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.46 0.60 61 70774 46 6 35 5 71
3IZF_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 33 6864 6 0 6 0 21
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 3 0 1 2 7
3J0L_h - 0.77 0.65 0.90 28 6074 3 0 3 0 15
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.88 42 9132 7 0 6 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 552 11 2 7 2 6
3NPB_A 0.72 0.61 0.85 28 6988 8 1 4 3 18
3O58_3 0.31 0.34 0.29 12 12362 41 4 25 12 23
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3OVS_D - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 548 1 0 1 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 1 0 0 1 1
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.45 0.35 0.59 13 3138 9 1 8 0 24
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.12 5 11738 49 7 31 11 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 788
Total TN 246228
Total FP 398
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 288
Total FP COMP 52
Total FN 514
Total Scores
MCC 0.647
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.718 ± 0.084
Sensitivity 0.605
Positive Predictive Value 0.695
Nr of predictions 50

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 343 0 0 0 0 2
2KZL_A - 0.86 0.74 1.00 14 1471 0 0 0 0 5
2L1F_B 0.96 0.96 0.96 24 2120 1 0 1 0 1
2L1F_A 0.96 0.96 0.96 23 2056 1 0 1 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 6 0 5 1 9
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LHP_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 651 0 0 0 0 1
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LJJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 343 2 0 0 2 0
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.93 0.87 1.00 34 6071 3 0 0 3 5
2LQZ_A - 0.85 0.82 0.90 9 341 1 1 0 0 2
2LWK_A - 0.75 0.69 0.82 9 485 2 0 2 0 4
2XXA_G 0.34 0.31 0.39 13 5118 20 1 19 0 29
2YIE_X - 0.36 0.33 0.40 4 1368 8 2 4 2 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 16 3 12 1 12
3AKZ_H 0.16 0.14 0.19 4 2680 17 2 15 0 24
3AM1_B - 0.72 0.66 0.79 23 3211 6 0 6 0 12
3IYQ_A 0.31 0.34 0.29 32 60616 82 23 55 4 62
3IZ4_A 0.48 0.45 0.51 59 70760 58 11 46 1 73
3IZF_C 0.66 0.57 0.76 31 6862 10 1 9 0 23
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1210 15 1 14 0 17
3J0L_1 - 0.73 0.63 0.86 12 1211 3 0 2 1 7
3J0L_h - 0.73 0.60 0.90 26 6076 5 0 3 2 17
3NDB_M - 0.84 0.74 0.96 45 9133 3 0 2 1 16
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 553 10 1 7 2 6
3NPB_A 0.74 0.61 0.90 28 6990 5 0 3 2 18
3O58_3 0.34 0.34 0.34 12 12368 37 2 21 14 23
3O58_2 0.66 0.66 0.66 25 7222 14 4 9 1 13
3OVS_D - 0.80 0.77 0.83 10 549 2 0 2 0 3
3P22_G - 0.87 0.83 0.91 10 730 1 0 1 0 2
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SIU_F - 0.85 0.73 1.00 8 370 0 0 0 0 3
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 1 0 0 1 1
4A1C_2 0.14 0.15 0.14 5 11745 43 5 26 12 28
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.67 0.58 0.79 11 1261 3 1 2 0 8

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.