CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot Cylofold
MCC 0.679 > 0.644
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.694 ± 0.074 > 0.674 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.621 > 0.555
Positive Predictive Value 0.748 < 0.755
Total TP 896 > 800
Total TN 150922 < 151060
Total FP 360 > 301
Total FP CONTRA 41 > 36
Total FP INCONS 261 > 224
Total FP COMP 58 > 41
Total FN 546 < 642
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 896
Total TN 150922
Total FP 360
Total FP CONTRA 41
Total FP INCONS 261
Total FP COMP 58
Total FN 546
Total Scores
MCC 0.679
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.694 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.621
Positive Predictive Value 0.748
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.69 0.60 0.80 24 5121 11 2 4 5 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.70 0.88 7 343 1 0 1 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.74 0.93 14 1470 1 0 1 0 5
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 621 3 0 3 0 13
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.85 0.77 0.94 30 6073 4 0 2 2 9
2LWK_A - 0.88 0.85 0.92 11 484 1 0 1 0 2
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 24 0 9 15 10
2XQD_Y 0.90 0.81 1.00 22 2828 1 0 0 1 5
2XXA_G 0.26 0.24 0.29 10 5116 25 1 24 0 32
2Y9C_V - 0.65 0.63 0.68 15 2256 8 1 6 1 9
2YIE_X - 0.34 0.33 0.36 4 1367 7 2 5 0 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
3AKZ_H 0.73 0.75 0.72 21 2672 8 4 4 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.74 0.71 0.78 25 3208 7 1 6 0 10
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3IZF_C 0.72 0.61 0.85 33 6864 6 0 6 0 21
3J0L_2 - 0.27 0.27 0.28 9 6184 26 2 21 3 24
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_h - 0.77 0.65 0.90 28 6074 3 0 3 0 15
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 458 7 2 5 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 3 0 1 2 7
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1115 5 2 3 0 8
3J16_L 0.35 0.33 0.38 10 2749 16 1 15 0 20
3NDB_M - 0.77 0.69 0.88 42 9132 7 0 6 1 19
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 552 11 2 7 2 6
3O58_2 0.76 0.76 0.76 29 7222 10 3 6 1 9
3O58_3 0.31 0.34 0.29 12 12362 41 4 25 12 23
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 2 0 0 2 0
3OVS_D - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 548 1 0 1 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 1 0 0 1 1
3PDR_A 0.74 0.64 0.85 46 12826 10 1 7 2 26
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.48 0.65 20 3885 11 2 9 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.45 0.35 0.59 13 3138 9 1 8 0 24
3UZL_B 0.73 0.62 0.85 23 3543 4 0 4 0 14
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.45 0.42 0.50 8 1310 8 1 7 0 11

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 800
Total TN 151060
Total FP 301
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 224
Total FP COMP 41
Total FN 642
Total Scores
MCC 0.644
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.674 ± 0.067
Sensitivity 0.555
Positive Predictive Value 0.755
Nr of predictions 62

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.72 0.60 0.86 24 5123 8 2 2 4 16
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.72 0.53 1.00 10 1475 0 0 0 0 9
2L1F_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 2060 0 0 0 0 4
2L1F_B 0.92 0.84 1.00 21 2124 0 0 0 0 4
2L2K_A - 0.82 0.68 1.00 13 848 0 0 0 0 6
2L3C_B - 0.76 0.59 1.00 10 551 0 0 0 0 7
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.89 0.79 1.00 27 2458 0 0 0 0 7
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LC8_A 0.61 0.55 0.69 11 1524 5 0 5 0 9
2LDL_A - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 345 0 0 0 0 5
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LI4_A - 0.93 0.88 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 2
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2LKR_A - 0.50 0.44 0.59 17 6076 12 2 10 0 22
2LWK_A - 0.83 0.77 0.91 10 485 1 0 1 0 3
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2XKV_B 0.38 0.40 0.36 8 4538 23 7 7 9 12
2XQD_Y 0.81 0.78 0.84 21 2825 4 4 0 0 6
2XXA_G 0.10 0.10 0.11 4 5115 32 1 31 0 38
2Y9C_V - 0.59 0.54 0.65 13 2258 8 1 6 1 11
2YIE_X - 0.30 0.33 0.29 4 1364 10 2 8 0 8
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1529 11 3 8 0 12
3AKZ_H 0.66 0.57 0.76 16 2680 6 0 5 1 12
3AM1_B - 0.76 0.63 0.92 22 3216 2 0 2 0 13
3AMU_B 0.67 0.59 0.76 16 2982 7 0 5 2 11
3IZF_C 0.68 0.56 0.83 30 6867 6 0 6 0 24
3J0L_2 - 0.39 0.36 0.43 12 6188 18 2 14 2 21
3J0L_7 - 0.30 0.29 0.33 5 1210 10 0 10 0 12
3J0L_h - 0.48 0.37 0.62 16 6079 10 0 10 0 27
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 461 4 1 3 0 4
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_a - 0.22 0.19 0.27 3 1117 8 1 7 0 13
3J16_L 0.75 0.57 1.00 17 2758 0 0 0 0 13
3NDB_M - 0.58 0.48 0.71 29 9139 13 1 11 1 32
3NKB_B - 0.40 0.31 0.53 8 2001 7 0 7 0 18
3NMU_E - 0.20 0.17 0.25 1 557 6 1 2 3 5
3O58_2 0.80 0.68 0.93 26 7232 3 0 2 1 12
3O58_3 0.36 0.34 0.38 12 12371 29 5 15 9 23
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 0 0 0 0 1
3PDR_A 0.72 0.54 0.95 39 12839 4 0 2 2 33
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.62 0.50 0.78 21 3889 6 0 6 0 21
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 401 0 0 0 0 7
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 1 0 0 1 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
3U4M_B - 0.38 0.32 0.46 12 3134 14 0 14 0 25
3UZL_B 0.45 0.38 0.54 14 3544 12 1 11 0 23
3VJR_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 618 0 0 0 0 1
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1260 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.86 0.79 0.94 15 1310 1 1 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.