CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ProbKnot & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ProbKnot RDfolder
MCC 0.710 > 0.609
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.723 ± 0.086 > 0.642 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.657 > 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.776 > 0.732
Total TP 593 > 464
Total TN 66779 < 66909
Total FP 205 > 183
Total FP CONTRA 27 > 23
Total FP INCONS 144 < 147
Total FP COMP 34 > 13
Total FN 310 < 439
P-value 3.56938820447e-08

^top




Performance plots


^top





Performance of ProbKnot - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 593
Total TN 66779
Total FP 205
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 144
Total FP COMP 34
Total FN 310
Total Scores
MCC 0.710
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.723 ± 0.086
Sensitivity 0.657
Positive Predictive Value 0.776
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 16 845 0 0 0 0 2
2KXM_A - 0.78 0.70 0.88 7 343 1 0 1 0 3
2KZL_A - 0.83 0.74 0.93 14 1470 1 0 1 0 5
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.45 0.32 0.67 6 621 3 0 3 0 13
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 1 0 0 1 2
2LDT_A - 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 454 0 0 0 0 4
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 24 0 9 15 10
2XQD_Y 0.90 0.81 1.00 22 2828 1 0 0 1 5
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.65 0.63 0.68 15 2256 8 1 6 1 9
2YIE_Z - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 3 12 0 12
2YIE_X - 0.34 0.33 0.36 4 1367 7 2 5 0 8
3AKZ_H 0.73 0.75 0.72 21 2672 8 4 4 0 7
3AM1_B - 0.74 0.71 0.78 25 3208 7 1 6 0 10
3AMU_B 0.65 0.59 0.73 16 2981 8 0 6 2 11
3J0L_1 - 0.76 0.63 0.92 12 1212 3 0 1 2 7
3J0L_8 - 0.93 0.88 1.00 7 183 0 0 0 0 1
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.50 0.62 8 1115 5 2 3 0 8
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1212 13 0 13 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 458 7 2 5 0 4
3J16_L 0.35 0.33 0.38 10 2749 16 1 15 0 20
3NKB_B - 0.59 0.54 0.67 14 1995 7 0 7 0 12
3NMU_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 552 11 2 7 2 6
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 2 0 0 2 0
3OVS_D - 0.92 0.92 0.92 12 548 1 0 1 0 1
3P22_G - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 730 1 0 0 1 1
3R4F_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 23 2122 0 0 0 0 2
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.73 0.59 0.91 20 2189 2 1 1 0 14
3SD1_A 0.55 0.48 0.65 20 3885 11 2 9 0 22
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 394 0 0 0 0 0
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 2 0 0 2 1
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 1 0 0 1 0
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.73 0.58 0.92 11 1263 1 1 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.45 0.42 0.50 8 1310 8 1 7 0 11

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 464
Total TN 66909
Total FP 183
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 147
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 439
Total Scores
MCC 0.609
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.642 ± 0.095
Sensitivity 0.514
Positive Predictive Value 0.732
Nr of predictions 51

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KX8_A 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 847 0 0 0 0 4
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.78 0.74 0.82 14 1468 3 1 2 0 5
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2067 13 2 11 0 24
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 458 0 0 0 0 8
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4538 22 5 17 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.57 0.50 0.67 12 2260 7 1 5 1 12
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
2YIE_X - 0.38 0.33 0.44 4 1369 5 1 4 0 8
3AKZ_H 0.48 0.43 0.55 12 2679 11 1 9 1 16
3AM1_B - 0.47 0.43 0.54 15 3212 13 1 12 0 20
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_8 - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 184 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3NKB_B - 0.37 0.31 0.47 8 1999 9 0 9 0 18
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 731 0 0 0 0 2
3R4F_A - 0.76 0.68 0.85 17 2125 3 1 2 0 8
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 248 0 0 0 0 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4AOB_A 0.35 0.26 0.48 11 4348 13 1 11 1 31
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.