CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for RDfolder & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric RDfolder MCFold
MCC 0.615 > 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.072 < 0.652 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.511 < 0.622
Positive Predictive Value 0.750 > 0.597
Total TP 824 < 1003
Total TN 118373 > 117790
Total FP 305 < 798
Total FP CONTRA 34 < 79
Total FP INCONS 240 < 599
Total FP COMP 31 < 120
Total FN 788 > 609
P-value 1.83595875043e-07

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of RDfolder and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for RDfolder and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for RDfolder and MCFold).

^top





Performance of RDfolder - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 824
Total TN 118373
Total FP 305
Total FP CONTRA 34
Total FP INCONS 240
Total FP COMP 31
Total FN 788
Total Scores
MCC 0.615
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.633 ± 0.072
Sensitivity 0.511
Positive Predictive Value 0.750
Nr of predictions 89

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2K5Z_A - 0.79 0.64 1.00 7 399 0 0 0 0 4
2K63_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 398 0 0 0 0 2
2K66_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 223 0 0 0 0 2
2KD8_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 8 223 0 0 0 0 1
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 15 1113 1 0 0 1 4
2KEZ_A - 0.89 0.80 1.00 8 268 0 0 0 0 2
2KFC_A - 0.49 0.25 1.00 5 625 0 0 0 0 15
2KGP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 291 0 0 0 0 0
2KMJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 367 0 0 0 0 0
2KPV_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
2KU0_A - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 696 7 0 7 0 16
2KUR_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 5
2KUU_A 0.84 0.71 1.00 15 1113 1 0 0 1 6
2KUV_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
2KUW_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 5
2KX8_A 0.88 0.78 1.00 14 847 0 0 0 0 4
2KXM_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 5
2KZL_A - 0.78 0.74 0.82 14 1468 3 1 2 0 5
2L1F_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2067 13 2 11 0 24
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L2K_A - 0.94 0.89 1.00 17 844 0 0 0 0 2
2L3C_B - 0.91 0.82 1.00 14 547 0 0 0 0 3
2L3E_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 583 1 0 0 1 1
2L3J_B 0.94 0.88 1.00 30 2455 0 0 0 0 4
2L5Z_A - 0.86 0.75 1.00 9 316 0 0 0 0 3
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - 0.46 0.26 0.83 5 624 1 0 1 0 14
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 0 0 0 0 0
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1526 14 2 12 0 20
2LDL_A - 0.90 0.82 1.00 9 342 0 0 0 0 2
2LDT_A - 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 458 0 0 0 0 8
2LK3_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 267 0 0 0 0 1
2RP0_A - 0.64 0.42 1.00 5 346 0 0 0 0 7
2RPT_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 186 4 1 3 0 7
2RRC_A - 0.70 0.50 1.00 5 226 0 0 0 0 5
2WRQ_Y 0.57 0.59 0.56 10 2832 12 5 3 4 7
2WW9_D - 0.29 0.12 0.75 3 1949 1 0 1 0 23
2WW9_F - 0.71 0.60 0.86 6 293 1 0 1 0 4
2WW9_E - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 556 5 0 5 0 14
2WWQ_V 0.64 0.50 0.82 14 2909 4 0 3 1 14
2XKV_B 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4538 22 5 17 0 20
2XQD_Y 0.88 0.78 1.00 21 2829 0 0 0 0 6
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 1 0 0 1 0
2Y9C_V - 0.57 0.50 0.67 12 2260 7 1 5 1 12
2YIE_Z - 0.43 0.42 0.45 5 1529 6 3 3 0 7
2YIE_X - 0.38 0.33 0.44 4 1369 5 1 4 0 8
2ZY6_A - 0.58 0.58 0.58 7 691 5 1 4 0 5
2ZZN_D 0.84 0.78 0.91 21 2462 2 0 2 0 6
3A2K_C 0.86 0.75 1.00 21 2905 0 0 0 0 7
3A3A_A 0.53 0.41 0.71 15 3634 6 0 6 0 22
3AKZ_H 0.48 0.43 0.55 12 2679 11 1 9 1 16
3AM1_B - 0.47 0.43 0.54 15 3212 13 1 12 0 20
3AMU_B 0.18 0.15 0.22 4 2985 16 2 12 2 23
3DW4_A - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 347 4 0 4 0 10
3GCA_A - 0.54 0.29 1.00 5 523 0 0 0 0 12
3GX2_A 0.50 0.40 0.64 16 4346 10 1 8 1 24
3HAY_E - 0.91 0.83 1.00 15 2263 6 0 0 6 3
3HJW_D - 0.85 0.78 0.93 14 1638 3 0 1 2 4
3IAB_R - 0.86 0.86 0.86 12 1021 4 1 1 2 2
3ID5_D - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 490 6 3 3 0 9
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3IWN_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 4268 10 0 10 0 33
3J0L_1 - 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1215 2 0 1 1 10
3J0L_8 - 0.86 0.75 1.00 6 184 0 0 0 0 2
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1220 5 0 5 0 17
3J0L_g - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 462 3 1 2 0 4
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1124 4 1 3 0 16
3J16_L 0.22 0.17 0.31 5 2759 11 0 11 0 25
3JYV_7 -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 2830 20 0 20 0 32
3KTW_C - 0.08 0.07 0.12 3 4535 23 0 22 1 40
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NKB_B - 0.37 0.31 0.47 8 1999 9 0 9 0 18
3NMU_E - 0.41 0.17 1.00 1 560 3 0 0 3 5
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 1 0 0 1 0
3OVS_D - 0.96 0.92 1.00 12 549 0 0 0 0 1
3P22_G - 0.91 0.83 1.00 10 731 0 0 0 0 2
3R4F_A - 0.76 0.68 0.85 17 2125 3 1 2 0 8
3R9X_C - 0.84 0.80 0.89 8 586 2 0 1 1 2
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.30 0.17 0.54 7 3903 6 0 6 0 35
3SIU_F - 0.73 0.55 1.00 6 372 0 0 0 0 5
3SN2_B 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 395 0 0 0 0 1
3TRZ_Z - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 205 0 0 0 0 1
3TS0_U - 0.91 0.83 1.00 5 248 0 0 0 0 1
3TS2_V - 1.00 1.00 1.00 5 271 0 0 0 0 0
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1265 4 0 4 0 13
4ENC_A 0.43 0.32 0.60 6 1316 4 0 4 0 13

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1003
Total TN 117790
Total FP 798
Total FP CONTRA 79
Total FP INCONS 599
Total FP COMP 120
Total FN 609
Total Scores
MCC 0.604
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.652 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.622
Positive Predictive Value 0.597
Nr of predictions 89

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2K5Z_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 395 1 0 0 1 0
2K63_A - 0.90 0.90 0.90 9 396 4 0 1 3 1
2K66_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 221 0 0 0 0 0
2KD8_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 1 0 0 1 0
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 1 0 0 1 1
2KE6_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 1109 2 0 0 2 0
2KEZ_A - 0.90 0.90 0.90 9 266 1 0 1 0 1
2KFC_A - 0.28 0.25 0.36 5 616 9 2 7 0 15
2KGP_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 291 1 0 0 1 0
2KMJ_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 367 1 0 0 1 0
2KPV_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 548 2 0 0 2 0
2KU0_A - 0.97 0.94 1.00 15 688 0 0 0 0 1
2KUR_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 21 1107 0 0 0 0 0
2KUU_A 0.98 0.95 1.00 20 1108 1 0 0 1 1
2KUV_A 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1107 0 0 0 0 1
2KUW_A 0.95 0.95 0.95 20 1107 1 0 1 0 1
2KX8_A 0.91 0.89 0.94 16 844 2 0 1 1 2
2KXM_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 341 1 0 0 1 0
2KZL_A - 0.80 0.84 0.76 16 1464 9 1 4 4 3
2L1F_A 0.72 0.75 0.69 18 2054 9 0 8 1 6
2L1F_B 0.73 0.76 0.70 19 2118 9 0 8 1 6
2L2K_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 19 842 1 0 0 1 0
2L3C_B - 0.97 0.94 1.00 16 545 0 0 0 0 1
2L3E_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 582 1 0 0 1 0
2L3J_B 1.00 1.00 1.00 34 2451 0 0 0 0 0
2L5Z_A - 0.96 0.92 1.00 11 314 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LA5_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 615 15 0 15 0 19
2LBS_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 14 482 1 0 0 1 0
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
2LDL_A - 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 341 2 0 0 2 1
2LDT_A - 0.75 0.73 0.79 11 451 3 0 3 0 4
2LK3_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 10 266 0 0 0 0 0
2RP0_A - 0.44 0.42 0.50 5 341 5 1 4 0 7
2RPT_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 7 183 2 0 0 2 0
2RRC_A - 0.95 0.90 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 1
2WRQ_Y 0.27 0.35 0.22 6 2823 25 8 13 4 11
2WW9_D - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1925 28 5 23 0 26
2WW9_F - 0.59 0.60 0.60 6 290 4 0 4 0 4
2WW9_E - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 547 14 0 14 0 14
2WWQ_V 0.15 0.18 0.15 5 2892 30 4 25 1 23
2XKV_B 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4530 37 2 23 12 15
2XQD_Y 0.34 0.37 0.32 10 2819 22 1 20 1 17
2Y8W_B - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 184 2 0 0 2 0
2Y9C_V - 0.62 0.67 0.59 16 2251 13 2 9 2 8
2YIE_Z - 0.36 0.50 0.27 6 1518 18 4 12 2 6
2YIE_X - 0.06 0.08 0.06 1 1361 21 1 15 5 11
2ZY6_A - 0.51 0.58 0.47 7 688 8 3 5 0 5
2ZZN_D 0.61 0.63 0.61 17 2457 13 1 10 2 10
3A2K_C 0.44 0.46 0.42 13 2895 18 2 16 0 15
3A3A_A 0.89 0.86 0.91 32 3620 3 1 2 0 5
3AKZ_H 0.40 0.43 0.39 12 2670 19 3 16 0 16
3AM1_B - 0.93 0.89 0.97 31 3208 2 0 1 1 4
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3DW4_A - 0.90 0.90 0.90 9 341 3 0 1 2 1
3GCA_A - 0.04 0.06 0.07 1 514 13 1 12 0 16
3GX2_A 0.47 0.48 0.48 19 4331 22 0 21 1 21
3HAY_E - 1.00 1.00 1.00 18 2260 11 0 0 11 0
3HJW_D - 0.94 0.94 0.94 17 1635 8 0 1 7 1
3IAB_R - 0.84 0.93 0.76 13 1018 8 2 2 4 1
3ID5_D - 0.34 0.33 0.38 3 488 9 0 5 4 6
3IVN_B 0.39 0.39 0.40 12 2316 18 0 18 0 19
3IWN_A 0.19 0.21 0.18 7 4238 33 8 25 0 26
3J0L_1 - 0.79 0.79 0.79 15 1206 6 0 4 2 4
3J0L_8 - 1.00 1.00 1.00 8 182 0 0 0 0 0
3J0L_7 - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1206 19 4 15 0 17
3J0L_g - 0.13 0.25 0.08 1 452 12 8 4 0 3
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.19 0.17 3 1110 15 1 14 0 13
3J16_L 0.45 0.47 0.44 14 2743 19 1 17 1 16
3JYV_7 0.21 0.22 0.21 7 2817 26 0 26 0 25
3KTW_C - 0.40 0.40 0.43 17 4520 24 4 19 1 26
3LA5_A 0.32 0.32 0.34 11 2453 21 1 20 0 23
3NKB_B - 0.56 0.58 0.56 15 1989 13 0 12 1 11
3NMU_E - 0.28 0.33 0.25 2 553 12 0 6 6 4
3OVB_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 11 584 2 0 0 2 0
3OVS_D - 1.00 1.00 1.00 13 548 0 0 0 0 0
3P22_G - 1.00 1.00 1.00 12 729 5 0 0 5 0
3R4F_A - 0.92 0.92 0.92 23 2120 5 0 2 3 2
3R9X_C - 0.69 0.70 0.70 7 585 7 0 3 4 3
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
3SIU_F - 0.42 0.45 0.42 5 366 7 1 6 0 6
3SN2_B 0.55 0.58 0.54 7 393 6 0 6 0 5
3TRZ_Z - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 201 9 0 9 0 6
3TS0_U - 1.00 1.00 1.00 6 247 2 0 0 2 0
3TS2_V - -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 268 9 0 8 1 5
4A4U_A - 1.00 1.00 1.00 9 222 0 0 0 0 0
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.