Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of RNASLOpt
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of TurboFold(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for RNASLOpt & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
RNASLOpt |
|
TurboFold(seed) |
| MCC |
0.467 |
>
|
0.460 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.506
±
0.235
|
>
|
0.454
±
0.321
|
| Sensitivity |
0.380 |
=
|
0.380 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.582 |
>
|
0.563 |
| Total TP |
71 |
=
|
71 |
| Total TN |
27311 |
>
|
27307 |
| Total FP |
57 |
<
|
65 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
11 |
>
|
7 |
| Total FP INCONS |
40 |
<
|
48 |
| Total FP COMP |
6 |
<
|
10 |
| Total FN |
116 |
=
|
116 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance of RNASLOpt
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
71 |
| Total TN |
27311 |
| Total FP |
57 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
11 |
| Total FP INCONS |
40 |
| Total FP COMP |
6 |
| Total FN |
116 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.467 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.506
±
0.235
|
| Sensitivity |
0.380 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.582 |
| Nr of predictions |
6 |
Performance of TurboFold(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
71 |
| Total TN |
27307 |
| Total FP |
65 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
7 |
| Total FP INCONS |
48 |
| Total FP COMP |
10 |
| Total FN |
116 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.460 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.454
±
0.321
|
| Sensitivity |
0.380 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.563 |
| Nr of predictions |
6 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|