 | ||||||||||||||
| ||||||||||||||
 | ||||||||||||||
Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric | RNASampler(20) | Afold | |
|---|---|---|---|
| MCC | 0.597 | > | 0.518 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals | 0.633 ± 0.106 | > | 0.557 ± 0.126 |
| Sensitivity | 0.452 | < | 0.469 |
| Positive Predictive Value | 0.792 | > | 0.576 |
| Total TP | 327 | < | 339 |
| Total TN | 165276 | > | 165100 |
| Total FP | 134 | < | 310 |
| Total FP CONTRA | 21 | < | 40 |
| Total FP INCONS | 65 | < | 210 |
| Total FP COMP | 48 | < | 60 |
| Total FN | 396 | > | 384 |
| P-value | 3.13260312532e-08 | ||
Performance plots
Performance of RNASampler(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts | |
|---|---|
| Total TP | 327 |
| Total TN | 165276 |
| Total FP | 134 |
| Total FP CONTRA | 21 |
| Total FP INCONS | 65 |
| Total FP COMP | 48 |
| Total FN | 396 |
| Total Scores | |
|---|---|
| MCC | 0.597 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals | 0.633 ± 0.106 |
| Sensitivity | 0.452 |
| Positive Predictive Value | 0.792 |
| Nr of predictions | 19 |
2. Individual counts for RNASampler(20) [ download as .csv ]
| RNA Chain | Rfam family | MCC | SENS | PPV | TP | TN | FP | FP CONTRA | FP INCONS | FP COMP | FN |
| 2KDQ_B | 0.95 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 10 | 396 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2L94_A | 0.92 | 0.90 | 0.95 | 18 | 971 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 2 | |
| 2WRQ_Y | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 10 | 2832 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 7 | |
| 2XXA_G | 0.31 | 0.10 | 1.00 | 4 | 5147 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 38 | |
| 3A2K_C | 0.86 | 0.75 | 1.00 | 21 | 2905 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| 3G4S_9 | 0.50 | 0.28 | 0.89 | 16 | 7363 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 41 | |
| 3IVN_B | 0.78 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 19 | 2327 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | |
| 3IZ4_A | 0.47 | 0.32 | 0.69 | 42 | 70815 | 23 | 6 | 13 | 4 | 90 | |
| 3IZF_C | 0.74 | 0.57 | 0.97 | 31 | 6871 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 23 | |
| 3JYV_7 | 0.81 | 0.66 | 1.00 | 21 | 2829 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | |
| 3JYX_3 | 0.58 | 0.44 | 0.75 | 12 | 6312 | 11 | 0 | 4 | 7 | 15 | |
| 3JYX_4 | 0.32 | 0.30 | 0.34 | 10 | 12217 | 26 | 4 | 15 | 7 | 23 | |
| 3LA5_A | 0.76 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 20 | 2465 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| 3NPB_A | 0.68 | 0.48 | 0.96 | 22 | 6998 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 24 | |
| 3O58_3 | 0.43 | 0.34 | 0.55 | 12 | 12381 | 18 | 2 | 8 | 8 | 23 | |
| 3O58_2 | 0.79 | 0.71 | 0.87 | 27 | 7229 | 5 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 11 | |
| 3RKF_A | 0.76 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 20 | 2191 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| 4A1C_2 | 0.18 | 0.15 | 0.23 | 5 | 11759 | 30 | 0 | 17 | 13 | 28 | |
| 4ENB_A | 0.60 | 0.37 | 1.00 | 7 | 1268 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 |
Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for Afold
| Total Base Pair Counts | |
|---|---|
| Total TP | 339 |
| Total TN | 165100 |
| Total FP | 310 |
| Total FP CONTRA | 40 |
| Total FP INCONS | 210 |
| Total FP COMP | 60 |
| Total FN | 384 |
| Total Scores | |
|---|---|
| MCC | 0.518 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals | 0.557 ± 0.126 |
| Sensitivity | 0.469 |
| Positive Predictive Value | 0.576 |
| Nr of predictions | 19 |
2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]
| RNA Chain | Rfam family | MCC | SENS | PPV | TP | TN | FP | FP CONTRA | FP INCONS | FP COMP | FN |
| 2KDQ_B | 0.95 | 0.91 | 1.00 | 10 | 396 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2L94_A | 0.97 | 0.95 | 1.00 | 19 | 971 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | |
| 2WRQ_Y | 0.57 | 0.59 | 0.56 | 10 | 2832 | 13 | 5 | 3 | 5 | 7 | |
| 2XXA_G | 0.34 | 0.31 | 0.39 | 13 | 5118 | 20 | 1 | 19 | 0 | 29 | |
| 3A2K_C | 0.41 | 0.39 | 0.44 | 11 | 2901 | 14 | 2 | 12 | 0 | 17 | |
| 3G4S_9 | 0.48 | 0.35 | 0.67 | 20 | 7351 | 11 | 1 | 9 | 1 | 37 | |
| 3IVN_B | 0.78 | 0.61 | 1.00 | 19 | 2327 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 12 | |
| 3IZ4_A | 0.48 | 0.45 | 0.51 | 59 | 70760 | 58 | 11 | 46 | 1 | 73 | |
| 3IZF_C | 0.66 | 0.57 | 0.76 | 31 | 6862 | 10 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 23 | |
| 3JYV_7 | -0.01 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0 | 2827 | 23 | 1 | 22 | 0 | 32 | |
| 3JYX_3 | 0.54 | 0.56 | 0.54 | 15 | 6300 | 24 | 1 | 12 | 11 | 12 | |
| 3JYX_4 | 0.31 | 0.30 | 0.31 | 10 | 12214 | 35 | 5 | 17 | 13 | 23 | |
| 3LA5_A | 0.78 | 0.62 | 1.00 | 21 | 2464 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 13 | |
| 3NPB_A | 0.74 | 0.61 | 0.90 | 28 | 6990 | 5 | 0 | 3 | 2 | 18 | |
| 3O58_3 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.34 | 12 | 12368 | 37 | 2 | 21 | 14 | 23 | |
| 3O58_2 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 0.66 | 25 | 7222 | 14 | 4 | 9 | 1 | 13 | |
| 3RKF_A | 0.76 | 0.59 | 1.00 | 20 | 2191 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 14 | |
| 4A1C_2 | 0.14 | 0.15 | 0.14 | 5 | 11745 | 43 | 5 | 26 | 12 | 28 | |
| 4ENB_A | 0.67 | 0.58 | 0.79 | 11 | 1261 | 3 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 8 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.