Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of RNASampler(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of TurboFold(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for RNASampler(20) & TurboFold(20) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
RNASampler(20) |
|
TurboFold(20) |
| MCC |
0.660 |
>
|
0.620 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.672
±
0.162
|
>
|
0.638
±
0.156
|
| Sensitivity |
0.507 |
>
|
0.500 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.865 |
>
|
0.775 |
| Total TP |
147 |
>
|
145 |
| Total TN |
35843 |
>
|
35826 |
| Total FP |
39 |
<
|
54 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
<
|
3 |
| Total FP INCONS |
23 |
<
|
39 |
| Total FP COMP |
16 |
>
|
12 |
| Total FN |
143 |
<
|
145 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance of RNASampler(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for RNASampler(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
147 |
| Total TN |
35843 |
| Total FP |
39 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
0 |
| Total FP INCONS |
23 |
| Total FP COMP |
16 |
| Total FN |
143 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.660 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.672
±
0.162
|
| Sensitivity |
0.507 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.865 |
| Nr of predictions |
9 |
Performance of TurboFold(20)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
145 |
| Total TN |
35826 |
| Total FP |
54 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
3 |
| Total FP INCONS |
39 |
| Total FP COMP |
12 |
| Total FN |
145 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.620 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.638
±
0.156
|
| Sensitivity |
0.500 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.775 |
| Nr of predictions |
9 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|