CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Sfold & Murlet(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Sfold Murlet(seed)
MCC 0.682 > 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.708 ± 0.093 > 0.545 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.581 > 0.337
Positive Predictive Value 0.805 < 0.868
Total TP 455 > 264
Total TN 104234 < 104495
Total FP 158 > 46
Total FP CONTRA 10 > 5
Total FP INCONS 100 > 35
Total FP COMP 48 > 6
Total FN 328 < 519
P-value 5.10776592382e-08

^top




Performance plots


^top





Performance of Sfold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Sfold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 455
Total TN 104234
Total FP 158
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 100
Total FP COMP 48
Total FN 328
Total Scores
MCC 0.682
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.708 ± 0.093
Sensitivity 0.581
Positive Predictive Value 0.805
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Sfold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.95 0.91 1.00 10 396 0 0 0 0 1
2KE6_A 0.92 0.89 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 2
2KUR_A 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 3
2KUU_A 0.87 0.81 0.94 17 1110 2 0 1 1 4
2KUV_A 0.88 0.82 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 4
2KUW_A 0.90 0.86 0.95 18 1109 1 0 1 0 3
2L1F_A 0.98 0.96 1.00 23 2057 0 0 0 0 1
2L1F_B 0.98 0.96 1.00 24 2121 0 0 0 0 1
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.45 0.35 0.58 7 1528 5 0 5 0 13
2XKV_B 0.51 0.50 0.53 10 4541 23 0 9 14 10
2XXA_G 0.36 0.31 0.43 13 5121 17 1 16 0 29
3A3A_A 0.87 0.76 1.00 28 3627 0 0 0 0 9
3GX2_A 0.72 0.55 0.96 22 4348 2 0 1 1 18
3IVN_B 0.78 0.61 1.00 19 2327 0 0 0 0 12
3JYX_4 0.35 0.30 0.42 10 12222 23 3 11 9 23
3LA5_A 0.78 0.62 1.00 21 2464 0 0 0 0 13
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.91 30 6988 6 1 2 3 16
3O58_3 0.43 0.34 0.55 12 12381 17 0 10 7 23
3PDR_A 0.69 0.56 0.85 40 12833 9 0 7 2 32
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.65 0.50 0.84 21 3891 4 1 3 0 21
4A1C_2 0.16 0.15 0.17 5 11751 34 2 23 9 28
4AOB_A 0.50 0.40 0.63 17 4344 11 2 8 1 25
4ENB_A 0.76 0.58 1.00 11 1264 0 0 0 0 8
4ENC_A 0.51 0.26 1.00 5 1321 0 0 0 0 14

^top



Performance of Murlet(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Murlet(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 264
Total TN 104495
Total FP 46
Total FP CONTRA 5
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 6
Total FN 519
Total Scores
MCC 0.539
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.545 ± 0.074
Sensitivity 0.337
Positive Predictive Value 0.868
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Murlet(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KDQ_B 0.52 0.27 1.00 3 403 0 0 0 0 8
2KE6_A 0.66 0.53 0.83 10 1116 2 0 2 0 9
2KUR_A 0.63 0.48 0.83 10 1116 2 0 2 0 11
2KUU_A 0.63 0.48 0.83 10 1116 2 0 2 0 11
2KUV_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 16 1112 0 0 0 0 6
2KUW_A 0.84 0.76 0.94 16 1111 1 0 1 0 5
2L1F_A 0.82 0.75 0.90 18 2060 2 0 2 0 6
2L1F_B 0.80 0.72 0.90 18 2125 2 0 2 0 7
2L94_A 0.59 0.40 0.89 8 981 1 0 1 0 12
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1528 12 0 12 0 20
2XKV_B 0.45 0.20 1.00 4 4556 2 0 0 2 16
2XXA_G 0.38 0.14 1.00 6 5145 0 0 0 0 36
3A3A_A 0.57 0.32 1.00 12 3643 0 0 0 0 25
3GX2_A 0.59 0.35 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 26
3IVN_B 0.53 0.39 0.75 12 2330 4 2 2 0 19
3JYX_4 0.23 0.09 0.60 3 12241 4 0 2 2 30
3LA5_A 0.58 0.41 0.82 14 2468 3 1 2 0 20
3NPB_A 0.49 0.28 0.87 13 7006 2 1 1 0 33
3O58_3 0.45 0.20 1.00 7 12396 0 0 0 0 28
3PDR_A 0.44 0.19 1.00 14 12866 0 0 0 0 58
3RKF_A 0.53 0.35 0.80 12 2196 3 1 2 0 22
3SD1_A 0.47 0.26 0.85 11 3903 2 0 2 0 31
4A1C_2 0.46 0.21 1.00 7 11774 0 0 0 0 26
4AOB_A 0.58 0.33 1.00 14 4357 1 0 0 1 28
4ENB_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1269 0 0 0 0 13
4ENC_A 0.56 0.32 1.00 6 1320 0 0 0 0 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.