CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(20) MCFold
MCC 0.630 > 0.498
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.179 > 0.519 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.516 > 0.512
Positive Predictive Value 0.776 > 0.492
Total TP 128 > 127
Total TN 31477 > 31384
Total FP 48 < 149
Total FP CONTRA 2 < 18
Total FP INCONS 35 < 113
Total FP COMP 11 < 18
Total FN 120 < 121
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(20) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(20) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(20) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 128
Total TN 31477
Total FP 48
Total FP CONTRA 2
Total FP INCONS 35
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 120
Total Scores
MCC 0.630
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.648 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.776
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
3AMU_B 0.70 0.59 0.84 16 2984 5 0 3 2 11
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.18 0.15 0.21 5 11757 28 0 19 9 28
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 127
Total TN 31384
Total FP 149
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 113
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 121
Total Scores
MCC 0.498
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.519 ± 0.229
Sensitivity 0.512
Positive Predictive Value 0.492
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
3AMU_B 0.44 0.48 0.42 13 2972 18 2 16 0 14
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.