Table of contents:
- Overview
- Performance Plots
- Performance of TurboFold(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
- Performance of TurboFold(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
- Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(20) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...
Overview
| Metric |
TurboFold(20) |
|
TurboFold(seed) |
| MCC |
0.611 |
>
|
0.595 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.629
±
0.180
|
>
|
0.626
±
0.187
|
| Sensitivity |
0.490 |
=
|
0.490 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.768 |
>
|
0.729 |
| Total TP |
129 |
=
|
129 |
| Total TN |
32842 |
>
|
32833 |
| Total FP |
49 |
<
|
58 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
3 |
<
|
6 |
| Total FP INCONS |
36 |
<
|
42 |
| Total FP COMP |
10 |
=
|
10 |
| Total FN |
134 |
=
|
134 |
| P-value |
0.0 |
Performance of TurboFold(20)
- scored higher in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(20)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
129 |
| Total TN |
32842 |
| Total FP |
49 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
3 |
| Total FP INCONS |
36 |
| Total FP COMP |
10 |
| Total FN |
134 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.611 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.629
±
0.180
|
| Sensitivity |
0.490 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.768 |
| Nr of predictions |
8 |
Performance of TurboFold(seed)
- scored lower in this pairwise comparison
1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)
| Total Base Pair Counts |
| Total TP |
129 |
| Total TN |
32833 |
| Total FP |
58 |
| Total FP CONTRA |
6 |
| Total FP INCONS |
42 |
| Total FP COMP |
10 |
| Total FN |
134 |
| Total Scores |
| MCC |
0.595 |
| Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals |
0.626
±
0.187
|
| Sensitivity |
0.490 |
| Positive Predictive Value |
0.729 |
| Nr of predictions |
8 |
Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based
on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.
|