CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for TurboFold(seed) & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric TurboFold(seed) MCFold
MCC 0.550 > 0.497
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.266 > 0.515 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.465 < 0.510
Positive Predictive Value 0.659 > 0.492
Total TP 112 < 123
Total TN 30009 > 29929
Total FP 67 < 147
Total FP CONTRA 7 < 16
Total FP INCONS 51 < 111
Total FP COMP 9 < 20
Total FN 129 > 118
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of TurboFold(seed) and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for TurboFold(seed) and MCFold).

^top





Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 112
Total TN 30009
Total FP 67
Total FP CONTRA 7
Total FP INCONS 51
Total FP COMP 9
Total FN 129
Total Scores
MCC 0.550
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.555 ± 0.266
Sensitivity 0.465
Positive Predictive Value 0.659
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.92 0.90 0.95 18 971 1 0 1 0 2
2LC8_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1525 15 2 13 0 20
3RKF_A 0.76 0.59 1.00 20 2191 0 0 0 0 14
3SD1_A 0.59 0.48 0.74 20 3889 7 1 6 0 22
4A1C_3 0.69 0.57 0.84 31 7103 6 0 6 0 23
4A1C_2 0.15 0.15 0.15 5 11748 37 3 25 9 28
4ENB_A 0.69 0.47 1.00 9 1266 0 0 0 0 10
4ENC_A 0.65 0.47 0.90 9 1316 1 1 0 0 10

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 123
Total TN 29929
Total FP 147
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 111
Total FP COMP 20
Total FN 118
Total Scores
MCC 0.497
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.515 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.510
Positive Predictive Value 0.492
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2L94_A 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 971 0 0 0 0 1
2LC8_A 0.41 0.45 0.39 9 1517 16 0 14 2 11
3RKF_A 0.70 0.65 0.76 22 2182 7 1 6 0 12
3SD1_A 0.33 0.33 0.35 14 3876 26 0 26 0 28
4A1C_3 0.68 0.67 0.71 36 7089 17 1 14 2 18
4A1C_2 0.13 0.15 0.11 5 11735 56 10 31 15 28
4ENB_A 0.61 0.63 0.60 12 1255 8 2 6 0 7
4ENC_A 0.28 0.32 0.27 6 1304 17 2 14 1 13

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.