CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.567 > 0.557
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.353 > 0.542 ± 0.508
Sensitivity 0.596 > 0.505
Positive Predictive Value 0.551 < 0.625
Total TP 59 > 50
Total TN 7551 < 7578
Total FP 66 > 44
Total FP CONTRA 14 > 8
Total FP INCONS 34 > 22
Total FP COMP 18 > 14
Total FN 40 < 49
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 59
Total TN 7551
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 14
Total FP INCONS 34
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 40
Total Scores
MCC 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.609 ± 0.353
Sensitivity 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.551
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 50
Total TN 7578
Total FP 44
Total FP CONTRA 8
Total FP INCONS 22
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 49
Total Scores
MCC 0.557
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.542 ± 0.508
Sensitivity 0.505
Positive Predictive Value 0.625
Nr of predictions 5

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.