CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold Cylofold
MCC 0.679 > 0.673
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.686 ± 0.172 > 0.680 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.699 > 0.680
Positive Predictive Value 0.669 < 0.675
Total TP 107 > 104
Total TN 10300 < 10306
Total FP 74 > 60
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 13
Total FP INCONS 44 > 37
Total FP COMP 21 > 10
Total FN 46 < 49
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 107
Total TN 10300
Total FP 74
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 44
Total FP COMP 21
Total FN 46
Total Scores
MCC 0.679
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.686 ± 0.172
Sensitivity 0.699
Positive Predictive Value 0.669
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
3ADB_C - 0.85 0.85 0.85 28 1786 6 0 5 1 5
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 104
Total TN 10306
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 37
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 49
Total Scores
MCC 0.673
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.680 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.680
Positive Predictive Value 0.675
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3ADB_C - 0.84 0.82 0.87 27 1788 4 0 4 0 6
3NKB_B - 0.46 0.42 0.53 8 720 7 0 7 0 11
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.