CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold Fold
MCC 0.530 > 0.496
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.167 > 0.480 ± 0.198
Sensitivity 0.590 > 0.539
Positive Predictive Value 0.482 > 0.462
Total TP 210 > 192
Total TN 64794 < 64814
Total FP 283 = 283
Total FP CONTRA 94 > 85
Total FP INCONS 132 < 139
Total FP COMP 57 < 59
Total FN 146 < 164
P-value 2.12160100812e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and Fold).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 210
Total TN 64794
Total FP 283
Total FP CONTRA 94
Total FP INCONS 132
Total FP COMP 57
Total FN 146
Total Scores
MCC 0.530
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.597 ± 0.167
Sensitivity 0.590
Positive Predictive Value 0.482
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
3ADB_C - 0.85 0.85 0.85 28 1786 6 0 5 1 5
3IYQ_A 0.23 0.33 0.17 17 22339 97 47 37 13 34
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 192
Total TN 64814
Total FP 283
Total FP CONTRA 85
Total FP INCONS 139
Total FP COMP 59
Total FN 164
Total Scores
MCC 0.496
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.480 ± 0.198
Sensitivity 0.539
Positive Predictive Value 0.462
Nr of predictions 11

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3ADB_C - 0.86 0.85 0.88 28 1787 4 0 4 0 5
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22345 95 40 38 17 34
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3NKB_B - 0.41 0.42 0.42 8 716 11 4 7 0 11
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.