CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & PknotsRG [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold PknotsRG
MCC 0.493 > 0.468
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.559 ± 0.134 < 0.608 ± 0.125
Sensitivity 0.537 > 0.512
Positive Predictive Value 0.453 > 0.428
Total TP 1397 > 1333
Total TN 4970891 > 4970861
Total FP 2083 < 2157
Total FP CONTRA 525 < 526
Total FP INCONS 1163 < 1256
Total FP COMP 395 > 375
Total FN 1206 < 1270
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and PknotsRG. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and PknotsRG).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and PknotsRG).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and PknotsRG. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and PknotsRG).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1397
Total TN 4970891
Total FP 2083
Total FP CONTRA 525
Total FP INCONS 1163
Total FP COMP 395
Total FN 1206
Total Scores
MCC 0.493
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.559 ± 0.134
Sensitivity 0.537
Positive Predictive Value 0.453
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 228 8 1 7 0 8
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2RP0_A - 0.76 0.71 0.83 5 110 1 0 1 0 2
2WDL_A - 0.52 0.54 0.50 426 1444477 465 78 341 46 362
2ZZN_D 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 962 3 2 0 1 2
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3ADB_C - 0.85 0.85 0.85 28 1786 6 0 5 1 5
3GCA_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 151 9 1 6 2 7
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.67 0.68 0.68 19 1444 9 1 8 0 9
3IYQ_A 0.23 0.33 0.17 17 22339 97 47 37 13 34
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3JYX_5 - 0.34 0.44 0.27 210 1968232 793 260 300 233 271
3KIY_A - 0.53 0.55 0.51 430 1485031 475 81 338 56 356
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top



Performance of PknotsRG - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for PknotsRG

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 1333
Total TN 4970861
Total FP 2157
Total FP CONTRA 526
Total FP INCONS 1256
Total FP COMP 375
Total FN 1270
Total Scores
MCC 0.468
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.608 ± 0.125
Sensitivity 0.512
Positive Predictive Value 0.428
Nr of predictions 24

^top



2. Individual counts for PknotsRG [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.77 0.88 0.70 7 226 3 2 1 0 1
2LC8_A 0.66 0.61 0.73 11 513 4 2 2 0 7
2RP0_A - 0.87 1.00 0.78 7 107 2 2 0 0 0
2WDL_A - 0.47 0.49 0.45 389 1444457 514 87 389 38 399
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.47 0.50 0.46 11 1084 13 3 10 0 11
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.35 0.36 0.36 12 1786 21 1 20 0 21
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.21 0.21 0.24 6 1447 19 1 18 0 22
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.17 17 22340 94 45 38 11 34
3IZ4_A 0.56 0.60 0.52 57 25426 57 25 28 4 38
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1089 22 4 18 0 20
3JYX_5 - 0.37 0.46 0.29 220 1968248 778 241 293 244 261
3KIY_A - 0.47 0.50 0.45 393 1485010 525 91 386 48 393
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.93 0.86 1.00 32 2246 4 0 0 4 5
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 35 6 15 14 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.18 0.25 0.14 5 4480 43 11 20 12 15
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.