CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Afold & RDfolder [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Afold RDfolder
MCC 0.691 > 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.623 ± 0.201 > 0.602 ± 0.204
Sensitivity 0.681 > 0.535
Positive Predictive Value 0.714 > 0.674
Total TP 205 > 161
Total TN 12675 < 12723
Total FP 89 > 78
Total FP CONTRA 12 < 13
Total FP INCONS 70 > 65
Total FP COMP 7 > 0
Total FN 96 < 140
P-value 2.39162260866e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Afold and RDfolder. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RDfolder).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RDfolder).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Afold and RDfolder. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Afold and RDfolder).

^top





Performance of Afold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 205
Total TN 12675
Total FP 89
Total FP CONTRA 12
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 7
Total FN 96
Total Scores
MCC 0.691
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.623 ± 0.201
Sensitivity 0.681
Positive Predictive Value 0.714
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 228 8 1 7 0 8
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2RP0_A - 0.76 0.71 0.83 5 110 1 0 1 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 962 3 2 0 1 2
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3ADB_C - 0.85 0.85 0.85 28 1786 6 0 5 1 5
3GCA_A - -0.04 0.00 0.00 0 151 9 1 6 2 7
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.67 0.68 0.68 19 1444 9 1 8 0 9
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top



Performance of RDfolder - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RDfolder

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 161
Total TN 12723
Total FP 78
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 65
Total FP COMP 0
Total FN 140
Total Scores
MCC 0.592
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.602 ± 0.204
Sensitivity 0.535
Positive Predictive Value 0.674
Nr of predictions 15

^top



2. Individual counts for RDfolder [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 231 0 0 0 0 3
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 514 14 3 11 0 18
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3A3A_A 0.59 0.50 0.71 15 1479 6 0 6 0 15
3ADB_C - 0.48 0.45 0.54 15 1791 13 1 12 0 18
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 1462 10 1 9 0 28
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.43 0.42 0.47 8 718 9 2 7 0 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4ENB_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 462 4 0 4 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.