CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Alterna & MCFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Alterna MCFold
MCC 0.649 > 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.151 > 0.491 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.636 > 0.548
Positive Predictive Value 0.678 > 0.516
Total TP 204 > 176
Total TN 13763 > 13723
Total FP 100 < 176
Total FP CONTRA 27 < 36
Total FP INCONS 70 < 129
Total FP COMP 3 < 11
Total FN 117 < 145
P-value 2.78993384543e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Alterna and MCFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and MCFold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and MCFold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Alterna and MCFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Alterna and MCFold).

^top





Performance of Alterna - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Alterna

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 204
Total TN 13763
Total FP 100
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 70
Total FP COMP 3
Total FN 117
Total Scores
MCC 0.649
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.151
Sensitivity 0.636
Positive Predictive Value 0.678
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for Alterna [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.79 0.63 1.00 5 231 0 0 0 0 3
2LC8_A 0.47 0.44 0.53 8 513 7 0 7 0 10
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 2 2 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3GCA_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 153 0 0 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.56 0.57 0.57 16 1421 13 4 8 1 12
3IVN_B 0.81 0.78 0.86 18 882 3 2 1 0 5
3IWN_A 0.81 0.79 0.85 22 1446 5 1 3 1 6
3J0L_a - 0.18 0.18 0.22 2 402 8 3 4 1 9
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1089 22 4 18 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.41 0.42 0.42 8 716 11 3 8 0 11
3RKF_A 0.82 0.79 0.86 19 844 3 1 2 0 5
3SD1_A 0.55 0.55 0.57 16 1505 12 4 8 0 13

^top



Performance of MCFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MCFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 176
Total TN 13723
Total FP 176
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 129
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 145
Total Scores
MCC 0.521
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.491 ± 0.144
Sensitivity 0.548
Positive Predictive Value 0.516
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for MCFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.54 0.63 0.50 5 226 5 2 3 0 3
2LC8_A 0.44 0.44 0.47 8 511 10 0 9 1 10
2RP0_A - 0.70 0.71 0.71 5 109 2 1 1 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.69 0.73 0.67 16 960 11 1 7 3 6
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3A3A_A 0.98 0.97 1.00 29 1471 0 0 0 0 1
3GCA_A - -0.05 0.00 0.00 0 150 8 4 4 0 7
3GX2_A 0.58 0.61 0.57 17 1419 15 1 12 2 11
3IVN_B 0.45 0.48 0.46 11 879 14 5 8 1 12
3IWN_A 0.19 0.21 0.20 6 1442 24 5 19 0 22
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.15 2 398 13 1 10 2 9
3JYV_7 0.25 0.30 0.24 6 1086 20 8 11 1 14
3LA5_A 0.44 0.44 0.48 11 931 12 2 10 0 14
3NKB_B - 0.68 0.74 0.64 14 713 8 2 6 0 5
3RKF_A 0.89 0.88 0.91 21 843 3 0 2 1 3
3SD1_A 0.43 0.45 0.43 13 1503 17 1 16 0 16

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.