CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CRWrnafold & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CRWrnafold ProbKnot
MCC 0.502 > 0.480
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.264 > 0.490 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.516 > 0.509
Positive Predictive Value 0.503 > 0.468
Total TP 82 > 81
Total TN 10506 > 10496
Total FP 103 < 110
Total FP CONTRA 27 < 33
Total FP INCONS 54 < 59
Total FP COMP 22 > 18
Total FN 77 < 78
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CRWrnafold and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and ProbKnot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CRWrnafold and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CRWrnafold and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of CRWrnafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 10506
Total FP 103
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.503
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 81
Total TN 10496
Total FP 110
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 59
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 78
Total Scores
MCC 0.480
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.490 ± 0.232
Sensitivity 0.509
Positive Predictive Value 0.468
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.60 0.64 0.58 7 399 6 4 1 1 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.