CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Afold
MCC 0.762 > 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.773 ± 0.136 > 0.593 ± 0.238
Sensitivity 0.640 > 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.911 > 0.547
Total TP 194 > 179
Total TN 42295 > 42181
Total FP 30 < 190
Total FP CONTRA 15 < 51
Total FP INCONS 4 < 97
Total FP COMP 11 < 42
Total FN 109 < 124
P-value 3.45489855545e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Afold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 194
Total TN 42295
Total FP 30
Total FP CONTRA 15
Total FP INCONS 4
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 109
Total Scores
MCC 0.762
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.773 ± 0.136
Sensitivity 0.640
Positive Predictive Value 0.911
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1087 0 0 0 0 1
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.67 0.52 0.88 49 25480 9 7 0 2 46
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 2252 6 1 1 4 13
3O58_3 0.64 0.45 0.91 10 4753 2 1 0 1 12
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 179
Total TN 42181
Total FP 190
Total FP CONTRA 51
Total FP INCONS 97
Total FP COMP 42
Total FN 124
Total Scores
MCC 0.565
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.238
Sensitivity 0.591
Positive Predictive Value 0.547
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.