CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & ContextFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) ContextFold
MCC 0.698 > 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.668 ± 0.379 > 0.596 ± 0.369
Sensitivity 0.557 > 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.880 > 0.645
Total TP 44 > 40
Total TN 6871 > 6859
Total FP 10 < 36
Total FP CONTRA 3 < 6
Total FP INCONS 3 < 16
Total FP COMP 4 < 14
Total FN 35 < 39
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and ContextFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and ContextFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and ContextFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and ContextFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 44
Total TN 6871
Total FP 10
Total FP CONTRA 3
Total FP INCONS 3
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 35
Total Scores
MCC 0.698
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.668 ± 0.379
Sensitivity 0.557
Positive Predictive Value 0.880
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of ContextFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 40
Total TN 6859
Total FP 36
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 16
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 39
Total Scores
MCC 0.567
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.596 ± 0.369
Sensitivity 0.506
Positive Predictive Value 0.645
Nr of predictions 4

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.