CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) Fold
MCC 0.758 > 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.738 ± 0.123 > 0.579 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.631 < 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.914 > 0.611
Total TP 212 < 214
Total TN 46506 > 46388
Total FP 33 < 182
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 45
Total FP INCONS 7 < 91
Total FP COMP 13 < 46
Total FN 124 > 122
P-value 8.09700314043e-09

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and Fold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 212
Total TN 46506
Total FP 33
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 7
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 124
Total Scores
MCC 0.758
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.738 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.631
Positive Predictive Value 0.914
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IZ4_A 0.67 0.52 0.88 49 25480 9 7 0 2 46
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 2252 6 1 1 4 13
3O58_3 0.64 0.45 0.91 10 4753 2 1 0 1 12
3PDR_A 0.92 0.90 0.94 45 4792 5 1 2 2 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 214
Total TN 46388
Total FP 182
Total FP CONTRA 45
Total FP INCONS 91
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 122
Total Scores
MCC 0.621
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.579 ± 0.179
Sensitivity 0.637
Positive Predictive Value 0.611
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.