CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(20) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(20) ProbKnot
MCC 0.758 > 0.630
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.738 ± 0.123 > 0.628 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.631 < 0.664
Positive Predictive Value 0.914 > 0.603
Total TP 212 < 223
Total TN 46506 > 46368
Total FP 33 < 192
Total FP CONTRA 13 < 58
Total FP INCONS 7 < 89
Total FP COMP 13 < 45
Total FN 124 > 113
P-value 1.13392142882e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(20) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and ProbKnot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(20) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(20) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(20)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 212
Total TN 46506
Total FP 33
Total FP CONTRA 13
Total FP INCONS 7
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 124
Total Scores
MCC 0.758
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.738 ± 0.123
Sensitivity 0.631
Positive Predictive Value 0.914
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(20) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IZ4_A 0.67 0.52 0.88 49 25480 9 7 0 2 46
3NPB_A 0.77 0.65 0.92 24 2252 6 1 1 4 13
3O58_3 0.64 0.45 0.91 10 4753 2 1 0 1 12
3PDR_A 0.92 0.90 0.94 45 4792 5 1 2 2 5
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.33 0.25 0.45 5 4505 8 3 3 2 15
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.68 0.47 1.00 7 489 0 0 0 0 8

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 223
Total TN 46368
Total FP 192
Total FP CONTRA 58
Total FP INCONS 89
Total FP COMP 45
Total FN 113
Total Scores
MCC 0.630
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.628 ± 0.163
Sensitivity 0.664
Positive Predictive Value 0.603
Nr of predictions 10

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.