CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & Afold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) Afold
MCC 0.668 > 0.551
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.141 > 0.617 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.526 < 0.597
Positive Predictive Value 0.851 > 0.514
Total TP 223 < 253
Total TN 67698 > 67468
Total FP 61 < 296
Total FP CONTRA 36 < 100
Total FP INCONS 3 < 139
Total FP COMP 22 < 57
Total FN 201 > 171
P-value 2.8150742666e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and Afold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Afold).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Afold).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Afold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Afold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 223
Total TN 67698
Total FP 61
Total FP CONTRA 36
Total FP INCONS 3
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 201
Total Scores
MCC 0.668
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.646 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.526
Positive Predictive Value 0.851
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
2ZZN_D 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 978 0 0 0 0 16
3A2K_C 0.52 0.27 1.00 6 1102 0 0 0 0 16
3A3A_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 1473 0 0 0 0 3
3IVN_B 0.86 0.83 0.90 19 882 2 2 0 0 4
3IYQ_A 0.56 0.55 0.57 28 22391 30 19 2 9 23
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.43 0.77 41 25483 17 12 0 5 54
3JYV_7 0.50 0.25 1.00 5 1106 1 0 0 1 15
3LA5_A 0.87 0.80 0.95 20 933 1 1 0 0 5
3NPB_A 0.79 0.65 0.96 24 2253 5 0 1 4 13
3O58_3 0.68 0.50 0.92 11 4752 2 1 0 1 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7

^top



Performance of Afold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Afold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 253
Total TN 67468
Total FP 296
Total FP CONTRA 100
Total FP INCONS 139
Total FP COMP 57
Total FN 171
Total Scores
MCC 0.551
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.617 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.597
Positive Predictive Value 0.514
Nr of predictions 14

^top



2. Individual counts for Afold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 6 0 5 1 7
2ZZN_D 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 962 3 2 0 1 2
3A2K_C 0.46 0.50 0.44 11 1083 14 3 11 0 11
3A3A_A 0.93 0.87 1.00 26 1474 0 0 0 0 4
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IYQ_A 0.23 0.33 0.17 17 22339 97 47 37 13 34
3IZ4_A 0.52 0.57 0.48 54 25423 63 27 32 4 41
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1088 23 4 19 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NPB_A 0.82 0.73 0.93 27 2249 6 0 2 4 10
3O58_3 0.41 0.50 0.34 11 4732 38 6 15 17 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 43 11 17 15 15
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 3 0 1 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.