CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & CentroidHomfold‑LAST [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) CentroidHomfold‑LAST
MCC 0.759 > 0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.292 > 0.628 ± 0.338
Sensitivity 0.593 > 0.567
Positive Predictive Value 0.978 > 0.746
Total TP 89 > 85
Total TN 9757 > 9734
Total FP 6 < 43
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 9
Total FP INCONS 1 < 20
Total FP COMP 4 < 14
Total FN 61 < 65
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold-LAST. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and CentroidHomfold‑LAST).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 89
Total TN 9757
Total FP 6
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.759
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.292
Sensitivity 0.593
Positive Predictive Value 0.978
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7

^top



Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 85
Total TN 9734
Total FP 43
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 20
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.628 ± 0.338
Sensitivity 0.567
Positive Predictive Value 0.746
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.