CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & Cylofold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) Cylofold
MCC 0.810 > 0.723
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.713 ± 0.254 < 0.740 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.673 < 0.703
Positive Predictive Value 0.978 > 0.751
Total TP 136 < 142
Total TN 14797 > 14747
Total FP 8 < 60
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 17
Total FP INCONS 2 < 30
Total FP COMP 5 < 13
Total FN 66 > 60
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and Cylofold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Cylofold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Cylofold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Cylofold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 136
Total TN 14797
Total FP 8
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 2
Total FP COMP 5
Total FN 66
Total Scores
MCC 0.810
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.713 ± 0.254
Sensitivity 0.673
Positive Predictive Value 0.978
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3O58_3 0.68 0.50 0.92 11 4752 2 1 0 1 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.88 0.98 44 4795 3 0 1 2 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7

^top



Performance of Cylofold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Cylofold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 142
Total TN 14747
Total FP 60
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 30
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 60
Total Scores
MCC 0.723
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.740 ± 0.196
Sensitivity 0.703
Positive Predictive Value 0.751
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for Cylofold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.64 0.61 0.69 11 512 5 1 4 0 7
3O58_3 0.42 0.50 0.35 11 4733 30 9 11 10 11
3PDR_A 0.86 0.78 0.95 39 4799 4 1 1 2 11
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4AOB_A 0.42 0.38 0.48 11 1414 13 3 9 1 18
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 0 0 0 0 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.