CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & Fold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) Fold
MCC 0.709 > 0.532
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.160 > 0.500 ± 0.189
Sensitivity 0.585 > 0.570
Positive Predictive Value 0.862 > 0.502
Total TP 237 > 231
Total TN 69431 > 69246
Total FP 63 < 292
Total FP CONTRA 33 < 88
Total FP INCONS 5 < 141
Total FP COMP 25 < 63
Total FN 168 < 174
P-value 1.95070920198e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and Fold).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 237
Total TN 69431
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 5
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 168
Total Scores
MCC 0.709
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.160
Sensitivity 0.585
Positive Predictive Value 0.862
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3IYQ_A 0.56 0.55 0.57 28 22391 30 19 2 9 23
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.43 0.77 41 25483 17 12 0 5 54
3NPB_A 0.79 0.65 0.96 24 2253 5 0 1 4 13
3O58_3 0.68 0.50 0.92 11 4752 2 1 0 1 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.88 0.98 44 4795 3 0 1 2 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7

^top



Performance of Fold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Fold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 231
Total TN 69246
Total FP 292
Total FP CONTRA 88
Total FP INCONS 141
Total FP COMP 63
Total FN 174
Total Scores
MCC 0.532
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.500 ± 0.189
Sensitivity 0.570
Positive Predictive Value 0.502
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for Fold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22345 95 40 38 17 34
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.61 0.59 58 25437 47 16 25 6 37
3NPB_A 0.77 0.73 0.82 27 2245 11 0 6 5 10
3O58_3 0.39 0.50 0.31 11 4728 41 9 16 16 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.92 0.94 46 4791 5 1 2 2 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 4 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4482 43 11 18 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 461 7 0 6 1 10
4ENC_A 0.36 0.33 0.42 5 484 8 0 7 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.