CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) ProbKnot
MCC 0.709 > 0.542
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.160 > 0.541 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.585 < 0.593
Positive Predictive Value 0.862 > 0.501
Total TP 237 < 240
Total TN 69431 > 69227
Total FP 63 < 304
Total FP CONTRA 33 < 102
Total FP INCONS 5 < 137
Total FP COMP 25 < 65
Total FN 168 > 165
P-value 1.14531876181e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ProbKnot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 237
Total TN 69431
Total FP 63
Total FP CONTRA 33
Total FP INCONS 5
Total FP COMP 25
Total FN 168
Total Scores
MCC 0.709
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.685 ± 0.160
Sensitivity 0.585
Positive Predictive Value 0.862
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3IYQ_A 0.56 0.55 0.57 28 22391 30 19 2 9 23
3IZ4_A 0.58 0.43 0.77 41 25483 17 12 0 5 54
3NPB_A 0.79 0.65 0.96 24 2253 5 0 1 4 13
3O58_3 0.68 0.50 0.92 11 4752 2 1 0 1 11
3PDR_A 0.93 0.88 0.98 44 4795 3 0 1 2 6
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 240
Total TN 69227
Total FP 304
Total FP CONTRA 102
Total FP INCONS 137
Total FP COMP 65
Total FN 165
Total Scores
MCC 0.542
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.541 ± 0.188
Sensitivity 0.593
Positive Predictive Value 0.501
Nr of predictions 12

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22346 97 41 36 20 34
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.