CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidAlifold(seed) & TurboFold(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidAlifold(seed) TurboFold(seed)
MCC 0.759 > 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.292 > 0.565 ± 0.318
Sensitivity 0.593 > 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.978 > 0.602
Total TP 89 > 80
Total TN 9757 > 9715
Total FP 6 < 66
Total FP CONTRA 1 < 17
Total FP INCONS 1 < 36
Total FP COMP 4 < 13
Total FN 61 < 70
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) and TurboFold(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidAlifold(seed) - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidAlifold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 89
Total TN 9757
Total FP 6
Total FP CONTRA 1
Total FP INCONS 1
Total FP COMP 4
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.759
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.671 ± 0.292
Sensitivity 0.593
Positive Predictive Value 0.978
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidAlifold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.00 0.00 0.00 0 528 0 0 0 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.85 0.76 0.96 22 1510 1 0 1 0 7
4A1C_2 0.60 0.40 0.89 8 4507 3 1 0 2 12
4AOB_A 0.89 0.79 1.00 23 1414 2 0 0 2 6
4ENB_A 0.72 0.53 1.00 8 464 0 0 0 0 7
4ENC_A 0.73 0.53 1.00 8 488 0 0 0 0 7

^top



Performance of TurboFold(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for TurboFold(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 9715
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 36
Total FP COMP 13
Total FN 70
Total Scores
MCC 0.560
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.565 ± 0.318
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.602
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for TurboFold(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1506 7 2 5 0 9
4A1C_2 0.20 0.25 0.17 5 4486 37 9 16 12 15
4AOB_A 0.67 0.59 0.77 17 1415 6 2 3 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.