CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold IPknot
MCC 0.632 > 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.185 > 0.588 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.596 > 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.681 > 0.658
Total TP 109 > 106
Total TN 11375 > 11374
Total FP 65 < 66
Total FP CONTRA 20 > 17
Total FP INCONS 31 < 38
Total FP COMP 14 > 11
Total FN 74 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and IPknot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and IPknot).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 109
Total TN 11375
Total FP 65
Total FP CONTRA 20
Total FP INCONS 31
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 74
Total Scores
MCC 0.632
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.640 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.596
Positive Predictive Value 0.681
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.51 0.39 0.70 7 518 3 1 2 0 11
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.36 0.50 4 403 5 3 1 1 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 106
Total TN 11374
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.658
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.18 0.18 2 400 10 3 6 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 1254 3 2 0 1 2
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.