CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & ProbKnot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold ProbKnot
MCC 0.620 > 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.650 ± 0.124 > 0.574 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.623 > 0.613
Positive Predictive Value 0.623 > 0.525
Total TP 299 > 294
Total TN 73672 > 73592
Total FP 231 < 341
Total FP CONTRA 80 < 114
Total FP INCONS 101 < 152
Total FP COMP 50 < 75
Total FN 181 < 186
P-value 2.89169006118e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and ProbKnot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and ProbKnot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and ProbKnot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and ProbKnot).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 299
Total TN 73672
Total FP 231
Total FP CONTRA 80
Total FP INCONS 101
Total FP COMP 50
Total FN 181
Total Scores
MCC 0.620
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.650 ± 0.124
Sensitivity 0.623
Positive Predictive Value 0.623
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2003 9 1 0 8 3
2LC8_A 0.51 0.39 0.70 7 518 3 1 2 0 11
3IYQ_A 0.29 0.39 0.22 20 22347 86 39 34 13 31
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 54 25451 38 16 15 7 41
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.36 0.50 4 403 5 3 1 1 7
3NKB_B - 0.66 0.68 0.65 13 715 7 0 7 0 6
3NPB_A 0.87 0.84 0.91 31 2244 8 1 2 5 6
3O58_3 0.44 0.41 0.47 9 4745 11 1 9 1 13
3PDR_A 0.88 0.86 0.90 43 4792 7 2 3 2 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of ProbKnot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ProbKnot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 294
Total TN 73592
Total FP 341
Total FP CONTRA 114
Total FP INCONS 152
Total FP COMP 75
Total FN 186
Total Scores
MCC 0.564
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.141
Sensitivity 0.613
Positive Predictive Value 0.525
Nr of predictions 16

^top



2. Individual counts for ProbKnot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.82 0.87 0.77 20 1998 15 6 0 9 3
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3IYQ_A 0.24 0.33 0.18 17 22346 97 41 36 20 34
3IZ4_A 0.59 0.61 0.57 58 25435 49 17 26 6 37
3J0L_a - 0.60 0.64 0.58 7 399 6 4 1 1 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.79 0.73 0.87 27 2247 9 0 4 5 10
3O58_3 0.38 0.50 0.29 11 4726 42 10 17 15 11
3PDR_A 0.88 0.92 0.85 46 4786 10 5 3 2 4
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.66 0.69 0.65 20 1502 11 6 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.58 0.59 0.59 13 1254 9 2 7 0 9
4A1C_2 0.17 0.25 0.13 5 4477 49 13 21 15 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.81 0.73 0.92 11 460 1 1 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.52 0.53 0.53 8 481 8 0 7 1 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.