CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & RNASLOpt [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold RNASLOpt
MCC 0.566 > 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.230 > 0.484 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.531 > 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.616 > 0.475
Total TP 69 > 57
Total TN 9024 > 9016
Total FP 57 < 73
Total FP CONTRA 16 < 23
Total FP INCONS 27 < 40
Total FP COMP 14 > 10
Total FN 61 < 73
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and RNASLOpt. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASLOpt).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and RNASLOpt. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and RNASLOpt).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 69
Total TN 9024
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 16
Total FP INCONS 27
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 61
Total Scores
MCC 0.566
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.593 ± 0.230
Sensitivity 0.531
Positive Predictive Value 0.616
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.51 0.39 0.70 7 518 3 1 2 0 11
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.36 0.50 4 403 5 3 1 1 7
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of RNASLOpt - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNASLOpt

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 57
Total TN 9016
Total FP 73
Total FP CONTRA 23
Total FP INCONS 40
Total FP COMP 10
Total FN 73
Total Scores
MCC 0.449
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.484 ± 0.218
Sensitivity 0.438
Positive Predictive Value 0.475
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for RNASLOpt [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.48 0.39 0.64 7 517 4 0 4 0 11
3J0L_a - 0.21 0.18 0.29 2 404 6 3 2 1 9
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.30 0.40 0.24 8 4482 35 13 13 9 12
4AOB_A 0.31 0.28 0.38 8 1416 13 3 10 0 21
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.