CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidFold & Vsfold4 [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidFold Vsfold4
MCC 0.704 > 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.733 ± 0.096 > 0.585 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.698 > 0.550
Positive Predictive Value 0.715 > 0.563
Total TP 496 > 391
Total TN 84758 > 84757
Total FP 252 < 356
Total FP CONTRA 85 < 94
Total FP INCONS 113 < 210
Total FP COMP 54 > 52
Total FN 215 < 320
P-value 4.89920829651e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidFold and Vsfold4. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Vsfold4).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Vsfold4).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidFold and Vsfold4. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidFold and Vsfold4).

^top





Performance of CentroidFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 496
Total TN 84758
Total FP 252
Total FP CONTRA 85
Total FP INCONS 113
Total FP COMP 54
Total FN 215
Total Scores
MCC 0.704
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.733 ± 0.096
Sensitivity 0.698
Positive Predictive Value 0.715
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2003 9 1 0 8 3
2LC8_A 0.51 0.39 0.70 7 518 3 1 2 0 11
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 3 2 0 1 1
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 0 0 0 0 1
3GX2_A 0.94 0.89 1.00 25 1424 1 0 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.86 0.79 0.96 22 1449 1 0 1 0 6
3IYQ_A 0.29 0.39 0.22 20 22347 86 39 34 13 31
3IZ4_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 54 25451 38 16 15 7 41
3J0L_a - 0.41 0.36 0.50 4 403 5 3 1 1 7
3JYV_7 0.92 0.85 1.00 17 1094 2 0 0 2 3
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.66 0.68 0.65 13 715 7 0 7 0 6
3NPB_A 0.87 0.84 0.91 31 2244 8 1 2 5 6
3O58_3 0.44 0.41 0.47 9 4745 11 1 9 1 13
3PDR_A 0.88 0.86 0.90 43 4792 7 2 3 2 7
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.70 0.69 0.71 20 1505 8 4 4 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
4A1C_2 0.22 0.25 0.19 5 4490 29 9 12 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of Vsfold4 - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Vsfold4

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 391
Total TN 84757
Total FP 356
Total FP CONTRA 94
Total FP INCONS 210
Total FP COMP 52
Total FN 320
Total Scores
MCC 0.553
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.585 ± 0.133
Sensitivity 0.550
Positive Predictive Value 0.563
Nr of predictions 25

^top



2. Individual counts for Vsfold4 [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KRL_A - 0.84 0.83 0.86 19 2002 9 2 1 6 4
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 515 13 0 13 0 18
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.95 0.95 21 962 1 1 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.95 0.91 1.00 20 1088 0 0 0 0 2
3A3A_A 0.95 0.90 1.00 27 1473 0 0 0 0 3
3ADB_C - 0.95 0.91 1.00 30 1789 0 0 0 0 3
3GX2_A 0.60 0.57 0.64 16 1424 10 0 9 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.28 0.25 0.35 7 1452 13 2 11 0 21
3IYQ_A 0.27 0.35 0.21 18 22353 80 40 29 11 33
3IZ4_A 0.39 0.39 0.39 37 25441 63 15 43 5 58
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 4 1 1 7
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1092 19 4 15 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.69 0.74 0.67 14 714 7 0 7 0 5
3NPB_A 0.66 0.59 0.73 22 2248 10 0 8 2 15
3O58_3 0.12 0.14 0.11 3 4737 35 8 16 11 19
3PDR_A 0.69 0.64 0.74 32 4797 13 3 8 2 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.23 0.24 0.24 7 1504 22 5 17 0 22
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.36 0.40 0.33 8 4492 28 4 12 12 12
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 487 0 0 0 0 6

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.