CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & CRWrnafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST CRWrnafold
MCC 0.601 > 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.537 ± 0.334 > 0.510 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.522 > 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.703 > 0.503
Total TP 83 > 82
Total TN 10551 > 10506
Total FP 50 < 103
Total FP CONTRA 10 < 27
Total FP INCONS 25 < 54
Total FP COMP 15 < 22
Total FN 76 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and CRWrnafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and CRWrnafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and CRWrnafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and CRWrnafold).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 83
Total TN 10551
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 76
Total Scores
MCC 0.601
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.537 ± 0.334
Sensitivity 0.522
Positive Predictive Value 0.703
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 408 3 1 2 0 11
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of CRWrnafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CRWrnafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 82
Total TN 10506
Total FP 103
Total FP CONTRA 27
Total FP INCONS 54
Total FP COMP 22
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.502
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.510 ± 0.264
Sensitivity 0.516
Positive Predictive Value 0.503
Nr of predictions 8

^top



2. Individual counts for CRWrnafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.39 0.36 0.44 4 402 6 3 2 1 7
3SD1_A 0.63 0.66 0.61 19 1502 12 6 6 0 10
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 44 8 20 16 15
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 8 4 3 1 9
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 2 0 0 2 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.