CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & MXScarna(seed) [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST MXScarna(seed)
MCC 0.645 > 0.593
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.628 ± 0.338 > 0.535 ± 0.268
Sensitivity 0.567 > 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.746 > 0.672
Total TP 85 > 80
Total TN 9734 > 9729
Total FP 43 < 57
Total FP CONTRA 9 < 11
Total FP INCONS 20 < 28
Total FP COMP 14 < 18
Total FN 65 < 70
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and MXScarna(seed). Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MXScarna(seed)).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and MXScarna(seed). The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and MXScarna(seed)).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 85
Total TN 9734
Total FP 43
Total FP CONTRA 9
Total FP INCONS 20
Total FP COMP 14
Total FN 65
Total Scores
MCC 0.645
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.628 ± 0.338
Sensitivity 0.567
Positive Predictive Value 0.746
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of MXScarna(seed) - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for MXScarna(seed)

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 9729
Total FP 57
Total FP CONTRA 11
Total FP INCONS 28
Total FP COMP 18
Total FN 70
Total Scores
MCC 0.593
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.535 ± 0.268
Sensitivity 0.533
Positive Predictive Value 0.672
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for MXScarna(seed) [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 518 12 0 10 2 18
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.74 0.76 0.73 22 1503 9 4 4 1 7
4A1C_2 0.45 0.40 0.50 8 4500 20 4 4 12 12
4AOB_A 0.71 0.69 0.74 20 1410 10 2 5 3 9
4ENB_A 0.54 0.40 0.75 6 464 2 0 2 0 9
4ENC_A 0.48 0.40 0.60 6 486 4 1 3 0 9

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.