CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & RNAwolf [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST RNAwolf
MCC 0.635 > 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.299 > 0.421 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.552 > 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.743 > 0.452
Total TP 101 > 80
Total TN 11399 > 11358
Total FP 50 < 114
Total FP CONTRA 10 < 22
Total FP INCONS 25 < 75
Total FP COMP 15 < 17
Total FN 82 < 103
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and RNAwolf. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNAwolf).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and RNAwolf. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and RNAwolf).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 11399
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 82
Total Scores
MCC 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.299
Sensitivity 0.552
Positive Predictive Value 0.743
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 408 3 1 2 0 11
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of RNAwolf - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for RNAwolf

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 80
Total TN 11358
Total FP 114
Total FP CONTRA 22
Total FP INCONS 75
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 103
Total Scores
MCC 0.436
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.421 ± 0.185
Sensitivity 0.437
Positive Predictive Value 0.452
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for RNAwolf [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.52 0.50 0.56 9 512 7 0 7 0 9
3J0L_a - 0.14 0.18 0.14 2 397 13 4 8 1 9
3RKF_A 0.89 0.83 0.95 20 845 1 0 1 0 4
3SD1_A 0.58 0.59 0.59 17 1504 12 2 10 0 12
3U4M_B - 0.50 0.50 0.52 11 1255 12 1 9 2 11
4A1C_2 0.12 0.15 0.10 3 4487 38 12 14 12 17
4AOB_A 0.26 0.24 0.30 7 1414 17 2 14 1 22
4ENB_A 0.45 0.40 0.55 6 461 5 1 4 0 9
4ENC_A 0.34 0.33 0.38 5 483 9 0 8 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.