CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for CentroidHomfold‑LAST & UNAFold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric CentroidHomfold‑LAST UNAFold
MCC 0.635 > 0.531
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.299 > 0.523 ± 0.238
Sensitivity 0.552 > 0.541
Positive Predictive Value 0.743 > 0.535
Total TP 101 > 99
Total TN 11399 > 11350
Total FP 50 < 105
Total FP CONTRA 10 < 30
Total FP INCONS 25 < 56
Total FP COMP 15 < 19
Total FN 82 < 84
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of CentroidHomfold-LAST and UNAFold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and UNAFold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for CentroidHomfold-LAST and UNAFold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST and UNAFold).

^top





Performance of CentroidHomfold‑LAST - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for CentroidHomfold‑LAST

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 101
Total TN 11399
Total FP 50
Total FP CONTRA 10
Total FP INCONS 25
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 82
Total Scores
MCC 0.635
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.574 ± 0.299
Sensitivity 0.552
Positive Predictive Value 0.743
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for CentroidHomfold‑LAST [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 517 11 0 11 0 18
3J0L_a - -0.01 0.00 0.00 0 408 3 1 2 0 11
3RKF_A 0.86 0.75 1.00 18 848 0 0 0 0 6
3SD1_A 0.77 0.66 0.90 19 1512 2 1 1 0 10
3U4M_B - 0.78 0.73 0.84 16 1257 4 0 3 1 6
4A1C_2 0.24 0.25 0.24 5 4495 29 8 8 13 15
4AOB_A 0.85 0.72 1.00 21 1416 1 0 0 1 8
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 0 0 0 0 4

^top



Performance of UNAFold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for UNAFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 99
Total TN 11350
Total FP 105
Total FP CONTRA 30
Total FP INCONS 56
Total FP COMP 19
Total FN 84
Total Scores
MCC 0.531
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.523 ± 0.238
Sensitivity 0.541
Positive Predictive Value 0.535
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for UNAFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A -0.03 0.00 0.00 0 513 15 3 12 0 18
3J0L_a - 0.55 0.64 0.50 7 397 8 5 2 1 4
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.77 0.76 0.79 22 1505 6 4 2 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1250 14 3 11 0 10
4A1C_2 0.19 0.25 0.15 5 4483 42 11 17 14 15
4AOB_A 0.60 0.59 0.63 17 1410 11 4 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 2 0 0 2 4
4ENC_A 0.37 0.33 0.45 5 485 7 0 6 1 10

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.