CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for ContextFold & Contrafold [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric ContextFold Contrafold
MCC 0.662 > 0.573
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.676 ± 0.208 > 0.607 ± 0.224
Sensitivity 0.608 > 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.731 > 0.605
Total TP 79 > 72
Total TN 9028 > 9017
Total FP 44 < 64
Total FP CONTRA 6 < 18
Total FP INCONS 23 < 29
Total FP COMP 15 < 17
Total FN 51 < 58
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of ContextFold and Contrafold. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Contrafold).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for ContextFold and Contrafold. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for ContextFold and Contrafold).

^top





Performance of ContextFold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for ContextFold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 79
Total TN 9028
Total FP 44
Total FP CONTRA 6
Total FP INCONS 23
Total FP COMP 15
Total FN 51
Total Scores
MCC 0.662
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.676 ± 0.208
Sensitivity 0.608
Positive Predictive Value 0.731
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for ContextFold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.58 0.56 0.63 10 512 6 0 6 0 8
3J0L_a - 0.80 0.73 0.89 8 402 2 0 1 1 3
3U4M_B - 0.98 0.95 1.00 21 1255 0 0 0 0 1
4A1C_2 0.26 0.25 0.28 5 4498 26 3 10 13 15
4AOB_A 0.62 0.59 0.68 17 1412 9 2 6 1 12
4ENB_A 0.77 0.60 1.00 9 463 0 0 0 0 6
4ENC_A 0.73 0.60 0.90 9 486 1 1 0 0 6

^top



Performance of Contrafold - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 72
Total TN 9017
Total FP 64
Total FP CONTRA 18
Total FP INCONS 29
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 58
Total Scores
MCC 0.573
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.607 ± 0.224
Sensitivity 0.554
Positive Predictive Value 0.605
Nr of predictions 7

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 3 2 0 11
3J0L_a - 0.53 0.55 0.55 6 400 6 3 2 1 5
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.