CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & IPknot [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold IPknot
MCC 0.629 > 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.174 > 0.588 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.612 > 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.659 > 0.658
Total TP 112 > 106
Total TN 11365 < 11374
Total FP 75 > 66
Total FP CONTRA 25 > 17
Total FP INCONS 33 < 38
Total FP COMP 17 > 11
Total FN 71 < 77
P-value 0.0

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and IPknot. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and IPknot).

  2. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and IPknot. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and IPknot).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 112
Total TN 11365
Total FP 75
Total FP CONTRA 25
Total FP INCONS 33
Total FP COMP 17
Total FN 71
Total Scores
MCC 0.629
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.644 ± 0.174
Sensitivity 0.612
Positive Predictive Value 0.659
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 3 2 0 11
3J0L_a - 0.53 0.55 0.55 6 400 6 3 2 1 5
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 5 4 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of IPknot - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for IPknot

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 106
Total TN 11374
Total FP 66
Total FP CONTRA 17
Total FP INCONS 38
Total FP COMP 11
Total FN 77
Total Scores
MCC 0.612
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.588 ± 0.219
Sensitivity 0.579
Positive Predictive Value 0.658
Nr of predictions 9

^top



2. Individual counts for IPknot [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2LC8_A 0.41 0.33 0.55 6 517 5 1 4 0 12
3J0L_a - 0.16 0.18 0.18 2 400 10 3 6 1 9
3RKF_A 0.91 0.83 1.00 20 846 0 0 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.74 0.69 0.80 20 1508 5 0 5 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.91 0.91 0.91 20 1254 3 2 0 1 2
4A1C_2 0.23 0.25 0.22 5 4493 26 8 10 8 15
4AOB_A 0.50 0.48 0.54 14 1411 13 3 9 1 15
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 0 0 0 0 4
4ENC_A 0.59 0.53 0.67 8 484 4 0 4 0 7

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.