CompaRNA - on-line benchmarks of RNA structure prediction methods
Home

Methods
Datasets
Rankings
RNA 2D Atlas

Help
FAQ

Contact us
RSS feeds
Twitter

Table of contents:

  1. Overview

  2. Performance Plots

  3. Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

  4. Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

  5. Compile and download dataset for Contrafold & Pknots [.zip] - may take several seconds...


Overview

Metric Contrafold Pknots
MCC 0.729 > 0.676
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.716 ± 0.103 > 0.678 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.719 > 0.693
Positive Predictive Value 0.747 > 0.668
Total TP 422 > 407
Total TN 37421 > 37377
Total FP 178 < 248
Total FP CONTRA 51 < 65
Total FP INCONS 92 < 137
Total FP COMP 35 < 46
Total FN 165 < 180
P-value 5.1503931209e-08

^top




Performance plots


  1. Comparison of performance of Contrafold and Pknots. Positive Predictive Value (PPV) is plotted against sensitivity. Each dot represents a single test of each method. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Pknots).

  2. Average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were plotted for different RNA families, for which at least 3 members were present in the benchmarking dataset. 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate the average and CI. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Pknots).

  3. Comparison of average Matthews Correlation Coefficients (MCCs) for Contrafold and Pknots. The whiskers correspond to 95% confidence intervals (CIs). 'n' denotes the number of MCCs used to calculate average MCCs and CIs. See tables below for raw data (individual counts for Contrafold and Pknots).

^top





Performance of Contrafold - scored higher in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Contrafold

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 422
Total TN 37421
Total FP 178
Total FP CONTRA 51
Total FP INCONS 92
Total FP COMP 35
Total FN 165
Total Scores
MCC 0.729
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.716 ± 0.103
Sensitivity 0.719
Positive Predictive Value 0.747
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Contrafold [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.71 0.63 0.83 5 230 1 1 0 0 3
2KRL_A - 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 2003 9 1 0 8 3
2LC8_A 0.46 0.39 0.58 7 516 5 3 2 0 11
2RP0_A - 0.84 0.71 1.00 5 111 0 0 0 0 2
2ZZN_D 0.93 0.95 0.91 21 961 3 2 0 1 1
3A2K_C 0.49 0.55 0.46 12 1082 14 3 11 0 10
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 0 0 0 0 1
3GCA_A - 0.76 0.71 0.83 5 152 1 1 0 0 2
3GX2_A 0.93 0.89 0.96 25 1423 2 1 0 1 3
3IVN_B 0.91 0.83 1.00 19 884 0 0 0 0 4
3IWN_A 0.86 0.79 0.96 22 1449 1 0 1 0 6
3J0L_a - 0.53 0.55 0.55 6 400 6 3 2 1 5
3JYV_7 -0.02 0.00 0.00 0 1091 20 4 16 0 20
3LA5_A 0.91 0.84 1.00 21 933 0 0 0 0 4
3NKB_B - 0.63 0.68 0.59 13 713 9 0 9 0 6
3NPB_A 0.86 0.84 0.89 31 2243 9 1 3 5 6
3O58_3 0.32 0.36 0.29 8 4736 21 7 13 1 14
3PDR_A 0.83 0.86 0.80 43 4786 13 5 6 2 7
3RKF_A 0.87 0.83 0.91 20 844 2 2 0 0 4
3SD1_A 0.68 0.69 0.69 20 1504 9 5 4 0 9
3U4M_B - 0.81 0.77 0.85 17 1256 5 0 3 2 5
4A1C_2 0.21 0.25 0.19 5 4489 33 9 13 11 15
4AOB_A 0.53 0.52 0.56 15 1410 13 3 9 1 14
4ENB_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 461 1 0 0 1 4
4ENC_A 0.85 0.73 1.00 11 485 1 0 0 1 4

^top



Performance of Pknots - scored lower in this pairwise comparison

1. Total counts & total scores for Pknots

Total Base Pair Counts
Total TP 407
Total TN 37377
Total FP 248
Total FP CONTRA 65
Total FP INCONS 137
Total FP COMP 46
Total FN 180
Total Scores
MCC 0.676
Average MCC ± 95% Confidence Intervals 0.678 ± 0.115
Sensitivity 0.693
Positive Predictive Value 0.668
Nr of predictions 26

^top



2. Individual counts for Pknots [ download as .csv ]

RNA Chain Rfam family MCC SENS PPV TP TN FP FP CONTRA FP INCONS FP COMP FN
2KFC_A - 0.17 0.25 0.17 2 224 10 3 7 0 6
2KRL_A - 0.79 0.83 0.76 19 1999 13 5 1 7 4
2LC8_A 0.83 0.83 0.83 15 510 3 2 1 0 3
2RP0_A - 0.87 1.00 0.78 7 107 2 2 0 0 0
2ZZN_D 0.95 0.95 0.95 21 962 1 1 0 0 1
3A2K_C 0.50 0.55 0.48 12 1083 13 3 10 0 10
3A3A_A 0.97 0.93 1.00 28 1472 0 0 0 0 2
3ADB_C - 0.98 0.97 1.00 32 1787 0 0 0 0 1
3GCA_A - 0.66 0.57 0.80 4 153 3 0 1 2 3
3GX2_A 0.55 0.57 0.55 16 1420 14 4 9 1 12
3IVN_B 0.91 0.87 0.95 20 882 1 0 1 0 3
3IWN_A 0.22 0.21 0.25 6 1448 18 2 16 0 22
3J0L_a - 0.35 0.36 0.36 4 400 8 3 4 1 7
3JYV_7 0.97 0.95 1.00 19 1092 2 0 0 2 1
3LA5_A 0.94 0.88 1.00 22 932 0 0 0 0 3
3NKB_B - 0.64 0.68 0.62 13 714 8 0 8 0 6
3NPB_A 0.84 0.81 0.88 30 2244 9 0 4 5 7
3O58_3 0.32 0.45 0.24 10 4722 39 18 14 7 12
3PDR_A 0.64 0.64 0.65 32 4791 19 4 13 2 18
3RKF_A 0.91 0.88 0.95 21 844 1 0 1 0 3
3SD1_A 0.78 0.76 0.81 22 1506 5 1 4 0 7
3U4M_B - 0.33 0.36 0.32 8 1251 17 4 13 0 14
4A1C_2 0.33 0.40 0.29 8 4488 36 9 11 16 12
4AOB_A 0.19 0.21 0.21 6 1409 23 3 19 1 23
4ENB_A 1.00 1.00 1.00 15 457 2 0 0 2 0
4ENC_A 0.97 1.00 0.94 15 480 1 1 0 0 0

^top


Matthews Correlation Coeffient, Sensitivity and Positive Predictive Value have been calculated based on the paper by Gardener & Giegerich, 2004.